Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

controller: Respect vehicle ID #754

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

goasChris
Copy link
Contributor

With #740 merged, we can now use the ID for controllers, so they as well will function with a non 1 id.

Tested in SITL with rover.

  • Arm/Disarm
  • Turn
  • Accelerate
  • Confirm existence of manual control mavlink packets in websockets

Driven with controller in cockpit with this PR:
image

Since we now have the current sys id available, we can have the
controller functions use that instead of being hardcoded to 1
Copy link
Member

@rafaellehmkuhl rafaellehmkuhl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@rafaellehmkuhl rafaellehmkuhl merged commit 226c0c7 into bluerobotics:master Feb 21, 2024
8 checks passed
@goasChris goasChris deleted the controller-vehicleID branch February 21, 2024 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants