Bump nanosim build #51084
Bump nanosim build #51084
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Changes
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/nanosim/build.sh (1)
6-6: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for consistency.The addition of copying Lua files is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of including a missing file required for certain modes of the NanoSim tool. This change ensures that all necessary files are included in the installation process.
For consistency with the Python files copying, consider using the same format:
-cp -rf src/*lua ${PREFIX}/bin/ +cp -rf src/*.lua ${PREFIX}/bin/This change uses
*.luainstead of*lua, which is more explicit in targeting Lua files and matches the style used for Python files.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- recipes/nanosim/build.sh (1 hunks)
- recipes/nanosim/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
recipes/nanosim/build.sh (1)
Line range hint
1-9: Verify the impact of Lua file inclusion on other parts of the package.The addition of Lua files to the installation process is a significant change. To ensure consistency across the package:
Please run the following script to check if any other files need updating to reflect this change:
This script will help identify if any other files in the repository, such as
meta.yaml, test scripts, or documentation, need to be updated to reflect the inclusion of Lua files.
| @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ source: | |||
|
|
|||
| build: | |||
| noarch: generic | |||
| number: 0 | |||
| number: 1 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Detected: src/ Directory Missing in build.sh
The build.sh script references a src/ directory (recipes/nanosim/src/), but no such directory exists in the repository. This discrepancy may prevent necessary files from being copied during the build process, potentially leading to build failures or missing functionalities.
Please verify the location of the source files and update the build.sh script accordingly to ensure all necessary files are included in the build.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Build number increment is appropriate.
The build number increment from 0 to 1 is correct and aligns with the Conda packaging best practices. This change suggests modifications to the package that don't warrant a version change, which is consistent with the PR objective of including a missing file for certain modes of the NanoSim tool.
To ensure the PR objective is met, please verify that the missing file is indeed included in the new build. You can do this by examining the build.sh script (which should be in the same directory as this meta.yaml file) for any changes related to file copying or installation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for changes in the build.sh file
cat recipes/nanosim/build.sh
Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in the src directory to verify inclusion of the missing file
ls -la recipes/nanosim/src/
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all src directories in the repository
find . -type d -name "src"
Length of output: 26
|
@BiocondaBot please add label |
Include missing file, required in certain NanoSim modes
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
nanosimpackage from0to1.