Merge pull request #1 from ericearl/ericearl-patch-1

Add the GSOD 2024 summary paragraph and update the metrics section

docs/collaboration/reports/google_summer/2024-gsod.md

@@ -21,28 +21,16 @@ Case Study Authors:
 
 ## Summary
 
-<table>
-  <tr>
-   <td><strong># Tech Writers</strong>
-   </td>
-   <td><strong>TW Project Hours</strong>
-   </td>
-   <td><strong>Budget</strong>
-   </td>
-   <td><strong>% Project Completed</strong>
-   </td>
-  </tr>
-  <tr>
-   <td>1
-   </td>
-   <td>150
-   </td>
-   <td>$6,500 USD
-   </td>
-   <td>100%
-   </td>
-  </tr>
-</table>
+| **# Tech Writers** | **TW Project Hours** | **Budget** | **% Project Completed** |
+|:------------------:|:--------------------:|:----------:|:-----------------------:|
+|          1         |          150         | $6,500 USD |           100%          |
+
+This project was trying to improve the BIDS Online Presence, which consists primarily of its informational websites and the BIDS specification.
+We were able to migrate away from a multitude of websites and condense down to mainly the one “New” BIDS Website.
+Overall the project was very succesful with a wealth of work put in by the tech writer and mentors.
+One lesson learned was we could have budgeted more for mentor time as it required more mentor time than anticipated.
+For other open-source volunteer or community-driven projects in need of coentralizing and streamlining their own online presence,
+this is a great program if you can define most of the tasks early on and dedicate mentor time alongside tech writer time during the project.
 
 ## Project Description
 
@@ -230,7 +218,9 @@ No unplanned deliverables arose in the course of this project.
 ## Metrics
 
 We performed a broad-reaching public BIDS community survey before this project started and a narrower website-specific survey at the 60% mark in this project’s timeline to assess the improvements being made to online materials.
-Data collected on the overall utility of the old vs the new website indicated the new site was rated significantly more positively in 82% of responses overall. Key improvements noted were acceleration in accessing info, more intuitive navigation in both the search bar and the navigation tabs, and the feedback reporting page.
+In user feedback collected on the overall utility as well as the ease of navigation of the old vs the new website (4 separate rating questions),
+users rated the new site as either as good or better than the old site for both utility and ease of navigation in 94% of respondents.
+Key improvements noted were acceleration in accessing info, more intuitive navigation in both the search bar and the navigation tabs, and the feedback reporting page.
 
 ## Analysis