Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(schema): Encode qMRI metadata requirements #2020

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: maint/1.10.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

This updates the schema in the maintenance branch, as this does not change the meaning of the specification. This also fixes a minor bug in the specification text, although we don't have a method to rerender it.

Fixes #2018.

@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ and a guide for using macros can be found at
| -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| TB1DAM | `FlipAngle` |
| TB1EPI | `EchoTime`, `FlipAngle`, `TotalReadoutTime`, `MixingTime` |
| TB1AFI | `RepetitionTime` |
| TB1AFI | `RepetitionTimeExcitation` |
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@agahkarakuzu I believe this is what TB1AFI should have said, but I want to run it by you.

@agahkarakuzu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Chris! Yes, this sequence has interleaved TRs, and both of them are of type RepetitionTimeExcitation.

Should we explicitly mention excitation component wherever possible?

https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/appendices/qmri.html#tb1afi-specific-notes

@effigies
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think that's fine. I probably could have read more closely; I was really just looking at the table and the glossary definitions of the different TRs.

@effigies effigies added needs review schema Issues related to the YAML schema representation of the specification. Patch version release. exclude-from-changelog This item will not feature in the automatically generated changelog labels Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
exclude-from-changelog This item will not feature in the automatically generated changelog needs review schema Issues related to the YAML schema representation of the specification. Patch version release.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants