Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] Move description of "n/a" above "String values" to avoid any association #1940

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

yarikoptic
Copy link
Collaborator

@yarikoptic yarikoptic commented Oct 3, 2024

as they should be applicable also to numeric values.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.87%. Comparing base (7ddb7be) to head (2fc9888).
Report is 81 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1940   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.87%   86.87%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        1410     1410           
=======================================
  Hits         1225     1225           
  Misses        185      185           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bids-maintenance - this is an easy low hanging fruit PR.

@yarikoptic yarikoptic added schema Issues related to the YAML schema representation of the specification. Patch version release. and removed schema Issues related to the YAML schema representation of the specification. Patch version release. labels Oct 28, 2024
@effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

No semantic change. I'm going to go ahead and merge and let people yell at me if they feel very strongly about the second review.

@effigies effigies merged commit 5b4b0fd into bids-standard:master Dec 18, 2024
27 checks passed
@effigies effigies added the exclude-from-changelog This item will not feature in the automatically generated changelog label Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
exclude-from-changelog This item will not feature in the automatically generated changelog needs review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] clarify/re-consider use of "n/a" in numeric columns
2 participants