Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENH] Allow plus signs in labels #1926

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[ENH] Allow plus signs in labels #1926

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
0afce3c
Allow plus signs in labels.
tsalo Sep 20, 2024
e32984c
Update test_rules.py
tsalo Sep 20, 2024
97de148
Remove self from CODEOWNERS.
tsalo Sep 20, 2024
8400bc6
Update formats.yaml
tsalo Sep 20, 2024
aa9c73c
Merge branch 'master' into plus-sign-labels
tsalo Sep 23, 2024
a950d08
Update src/schema/objects/formats.yaml
tsalo Sep 23, 2024
7ba5e39
[DATALAD RUNCMD] Replace more of label regexes present in various spo…
yarikoptic Sep 23, 2024
1481dc6
Adjust (or replace) mentionings of alphanumeric as now would include …
yarikoptic Sep 23, 2024
d692608
Allow for + in the paths, which can include labels
yarikoptic Sep 23, 2024
a096cba
Fix regex for `_run` index in a test_validator.py
yarikoptic Sep 30, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions CODEOWNERS
View file
Open in desktop
yarikoptic marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Validating CODEOWNERS rules …
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,5 +16,5 @@
/src/derivatives/diffusion-derivatives.md @francopestilli @oesteban @Lestropie

# The schema
/src/schema/ @tsalo @erdalkaraca
/tools/schemacode/ @tsalo @erdalkaraca
/src/schema/ @erdalkaraca
/tools/schemacode/ @erdalkaraca
9 changes: 7 additions & 2 deletions src/schema/objects/formats.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,8 +9,13 @@ index:
label:
display_name: Label
description: |
Freeform labels without special characters.
pattern: '[0-9a-zA-Z]+'
Free-form labels with alphanumeric and plus (+) characters.

Plus signs MAY be used to concatenate multiple applicable labels,
but no relationship is established by a partial match.
In particular, the inheritance principle does not connect files
containing "ent-X+Y" and "ent-X" or "ent-Y".
tsalo marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
pattern: '[0-9a-zA-Z+]+'
# Metadata types
boolean:
display_name: Boolean
Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions tools/schemacode/bidsschematools/tests/test_rules.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ def test_entity_rule(schema_obj):
nii_rule = rules._entity_rule(rule, schema_obj)
assert nii_rule == {
"regex": (
r"sub-(?P<subject>[0-9a-zA-Z]+)/"
r"(?:ses-(?P<session>[0-9a-zA-Z]+)/)?"
r"sub-(?P<subject>[0-9a-zA-Z+]+)/"
r"(?:ses-(?P<session>[0-9a-zA-Z+]+)/)?"
r"(?P<datatype>anat)/"
r"(?(subject)sub-(?P=subject)_)"
r"(?(session)ses-(?P=session)_)"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ def test_entity_rule(schema_obj):
json_rule = rules._entity_rule(rule, schema_obj)
assert json_rule == {
"regex": (
r"(?:sub-(?P<subject>[0-9a-zA-Z]+)/)?"
r"(?:ses-(?P<session>[0-9a-zA-Z]+)/)?"
r"(?:sub-(?P<subject>[0-9a-zA-Z+]+)/)?"
r"(?:ses-(?P<session>[0-9a-zA-Z+]+)/)?"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am afraid that is not all ... I will push a few commits on that end in a few minutes (I hope you don't mind).
Some other might need adjustment and I even start feeling that we might need to come up with some term (like "literal" but there might be better) to encompass "alphanumeric" and +.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yarikoptic Note this is a regression test that shows the specific output of a specific synthetic rule.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

my comment is not really about this test -- I meant that changes in this PR (just this test) aren't sufficient. pushed now

r"(?:(?P<datatype>anat)/)?"
r"(?(subject)sub-(?P=subject)_)"
r"(?(session)ses-(?P=session)_)"
Expand Down