-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] Use deidentification consistently in place of anonymization #1799
[ENH] Use deidentification consistently in place of anonymization #1799
Conversation
#1769 merged. |
src/CHANGES.md
Outdated
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ | |||
- \[MISC] Typo and style [#378](https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/378) ([TheChymera](https://github.com/TheChymera)) | |||
- \[FIX] divide readme into 3 parts [#374](https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/374) ([sappelhoff](https://github.com/sappelhoff)) | |||
- \[FIX] Refer to BIDS consistently, instead of "\<Modality>-BIDS" [#366](https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/366) ([sappelhoff](https://github.com/sappelhoff)) | |||
- \[FIX] Change recommended anonymization date from 1900 to 1925 [#363](https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/363) ([alexrockhill](https://github.com/alexrockhill)) | |||
- \[FIX] Change recommended deidentification date from 1900 to 1925 [#363](https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/363) ([alexrockhill](https://github.com/alexrockhill)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should not modify CHANGES.md. If there's a typo in a PR, we can edit the PR and it will get updated next time the changelog generator is run. In this case, I think it's okay to leave, since it accurately describes the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR #363 is precisely about deidentififcation, not anonymisation - shifting dates so that "chances of identifying a person based on the date and time of their scan would be decreased". I have actually modified the paragraph modified by #363:
Examples include anonymization or defacing of the data, or |
With that said, perhaps it is not worth chasing down this occurrence of anonymisation.
1febb47
to
2faf00b
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1799 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.92% 87.92%
=======================================
Files 16 16
Lines 1375 1375
=======================================
Hits 1209 1209
Misses 166 166 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
2faf00b
to
e9db606
Compare
In the vast majority of cases, strict anonymisation is impossible. Use the more generic term deidentification instead.
e9db606
to
fcfcb37
Compare
In the vast majority of cases, strict anonymisation is impossible. Use the more generic term deidentification instead.
I suggest #1769 is merged first, then I can rebase and fix all occurrences.
Fixes #1782.