BEP021: Electrophysiological Derivatives

[sappelhoff]

This PR aims to integrate BEP021 (Electrophysiological Derivatives) into the BIDS specification.

It is a work in progress (a draft PR). As a group we decided in several meetings that we might profit from taking the agreed upon aspects of the BEP in the Google Doc and formalizing them within this PR.

Please comment both in this thread, as well as with inline code reviews as to what you'd like to see changed / improved.

You are welcome to add changes directly via Pull Requests to this branch: https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/tree/bep021

My personal goal is to keep adding to this PR over the next days/weeks so that all applicable points from the BEP Google Doc are incorporated here.

To Do:

• Carry over changes from the Google Doc
• Review internally with the BEP021 team for completeness
• Community review
• Merging into the specification

General Links:

• Rendered preview
• BEP repo
• BEP Google Doc

Related PRs:

• [MISC] Update guidelines on file formats and multidimensional arrays - for derivatives #1614
• [ENH] Clarify meaning of raw vs derivative datasets #1537
• [ENH] Add descriptions.tsv file relating to the desc-<label> entity #1613

cc @christinerogers @CPernet @guiomar @robertoostenveld @arnodelorme @dorahermes

[sappelhoff]

I am closing this, because I do not expect to work on this, and nobody else seems to, either. Furthermore, we do not lose a lot of discussions or comments by closing this here.

Whoever wants to continue this work may open a new PR from the bep021 branch. https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/tree/bep021

[Remi-Gau]

Should we aslo remove the BEP from the listing of active BEP on the BIDS website?

[sappelhoff]

In my opinion yes, because it is not active, but I am no longer a moderator of that BEP.

[CPernet]

well, not active is sort of .. there are low hanging fruits in other derivative parts that needs sorted out before we can work again on that one