Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: improving inline admin #364

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

chore: improving inline admin #364

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 7, 2023

Conversation

mfagundes
Copy link
Collaborator

@mfagundes mfagundes commented Aug 31, 2023

EQP-81

Purpose

Allow editing columns in observation level via table admin

Description

The logic to save the observation level had to be customized, since it's different from the regular Django admin.

Checklist

  • I have reviewed the code changes.
  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have updated the documentation if needed.
  • I have added/modified tests to ensure the changes are valid.

Next steps

  • add tests
  • work in the template for the inline admin

@mfagundes mfagundes added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 31, 2023
@mfagundes mfagundes requested a review from vncsna August 31, 2023 15:30
@mfagundes mfagundes self-assigned this Aug 31, 2023
@mfagundes mfagundes added the preview Preview development deployment label Aug 31, 2023
@mfagundes mfagundes added preview Preview development deployment and removed preview Preview development deployment labels Sep 1, 2023
@vncsna
Copy link
Contributor

vncsna commented Sep 7, 2023

I just regressed to one file, and intend to split latter. Also merged main

@vncsna vncsna merged commit 97b231d into main Sep 7, 2023
2 checks passed
@vncsna vncsna deleted the feat/improving-inline-admin branch September 7, 2023 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request preview Preview development deployment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants