Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement function semtype in runtime #43140

Conversation

heshanpadmasiri
Copy link
Member

Purpose

$subject

Fixes #43107

Approach

Describe how you are implementing the solutions along with the design details.

Samples

Provide high-level details about the samples related to this feature.

Remarks

List any other known issues, related PRs, TODO items, or any other notes related to the PR.

Check List

  • Read the Contributing Guide
  • Updated Change Log
  • Checked Tooling Support (#)
  • Added necessary tests
    • Unit Tests
    • Spec Conformance Tests
    • Integration Tests
    • Ballerina By Example Tests
  • Increased Test Coverage
  • Added necessary documentation
    • API documentation
    • Module documentation in Module.md files
    • Ballerina By Examples

heshanpadmasiri and others added 22 commits July 23, 2024 07:55
Widened type for basic types is the basic type where as for other types it is contextually expected type (not the actual shape of the value). This is to avoid the overhead of having to create singleton types for each basic type value
Due to reasons that are not entierly clear to me when we run all the
unit tests some how types from `record_project_closed_rec_equiv` to
clashed with types defined in other unit tests. As a temperary
workaround I introduced a new package name for this.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2024

This PR has been open for more than 15 days with no activity. This will be closed in 3 days unless the stale label is removed or commented.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 7, 2024
Copy link

Closed PR due to inactivity for more than 18 days.

@heshanpadmasiri
Copy link
Member Author

Closed in favour of #43279

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant