fix: rlp decode of SignedTransction with interoperation signature

[KaoImin]

What this PR does / why we need it?

This PR:

1. Fix the interoperation transaction sender recovery:
   Original
   a. When the transaction is from API, the sender address is recovery by the interoperation logic
   b. When the transaction if from network and insert into mempool directly, the sender address is recovery by rlp decode. However, the rlp decode logic is different from the interoperation.
   Current
   The rlp decode logic is same as interoperation logic.
2. Remove the useless verify_by_ckb_vm verification code due to the schedule.
3. Only call CKB-VM mode is supported now

What is the impact of this PR?

No Breaking Change

PR relation:

• Fix The sender for a transaction with CKB-VM mode is incorrect. #1514

CI Settings

CI Usage

Tip: Check the CI you want to run below, and then comment /run-ci.

CI Switch

• Web3 Compatible Tests
• OCT 1-5 And 12-15
• OCT 6-10
• OCT 11
• OCT 16-19
• v3 Core Tests

CI Description

CI Name	Description
Web3 Compatible Test	Test the Web3 compatibility of Axon
v3 Core Test	Run the compatibility tests provided by Uniswap V3
OCT 1-5 | 6-10 | 11 | 12-15 | 16-19	Run the compatibility tests provided by OpenZeppelin

[yangby-cryptape]

If there is a bugfix, please split the bugfix and the refactor into two PRs, at least two commits.

As an answer of the #1514, base on this PR, I don't understand whether that issue is confirmed or not.

[KaoImin]

If there is a bugfix, please split the bugfix and the refactor into two PRs, at least two commits.

As an answer of the #1514, base on this PR, I don't understand whether that issue is confirmed or not.

They are divided into two commits.

[Flouse]

/run-ci

[github-actions]

CI tests run on commit:

• commit id: febdc75

CI test list:

• v3 Core Tests

Please check ci test results later.

[yangby-cryptape]

Looks good to me, except the following line:

axon/protocol/src/types/transaction.rs

Line 466 in c91a6af

public: Some(Public::zero()),

• Is it security?
• Why it's not just a None?

---

It's not easy for me to assess it right now.
So I just mark it, let's merge this PR first, then I will spend time to assess it later when I free.

[Flouse]

/run-ci

[github-actions]

CI tests run on commit:

• commit id: c91a6af

CI test list:

• OCT 1-5 And 12-15
• OCT 6-10
• OCT 11
• OCT 16-19
• v3 Core Tests
• Web3 Compatible Tests

Please check ci test results later.

[Flouse]

If there is a bugfix, please split the bugfix and the refactor into two PRs, at least two commits.
As an answer of the #1514, base on this PR, I don't understand whether that issue is confirmed or not.

They are divided into two commits.

Reminder

In order to preserve the commit history, please do NOT use merge_quere or squash merge for this PR.