Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MARP-1687 Release Preview page #267

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 31, 2024

Conversation

quanpham-axonivy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 26, 2024
@quanpham-axonivy quanpham-axonivy force-pushed the feature/marp-1687-preview-page branch 3 times, most recently from 82e4769 to 07e2e4c Compare December 27, 2024 03:13
@quanpham-axonivy quanpham-axonivy force-pushed the feature/marp-1687-preview-page branch from 04eba4b to c907a8e Compare December 30, 2024 03:29
@quanpham-axonivy quanpham-axonivy force-pushed the feature/marp-1687-preview-page branch 3 times, most recently from c36776a to 0d511dd Compare December 30, 2024 11:45
@quanpham-axonivy quanpham-axonivy force-pushed the feature/marp-1687-preview-page branch 2 times, most recently from 6a85d0c to 93fb3ef Compare December 31, 2024 04:12
@quanpham-axonivy quanpham-axonivy force-pushed the feature/marp-1687-preview-page branch from 855c4cf to 35fc6ed Compare December 31, 2024 04:32
nntthuy-axonivy

This comment was marked as spam.

Copy link
Contributor

@nntthuy-axonivy nntthuy-axonivy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@quanpham-axonivy quanpham-axonivy merged commit 413d90f into develop Dec 31, 2024
8 checks passed
@quanpham-axonivy quanpham-axonivy deleted the feature/marp-1687-preview-page branch December 31, 2024 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants