Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop using SDK v1 #338

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

josepanguera
Copy link

#274

When using this library it pulls the AWS SDK v1 because of the dependency declared on STS. But it seems is not actually used.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

When using this library it pulls the AWS SDK v1 because of the
dependency declared on STS. But it seems is not actually used.

This fixes [issue awslabs#274][1].

[1]: awslabs#274
Comment on lines +66 to +74
<!-- Because KCL 2.2.9 works on a different protobuf(2.6.1) than KPL's protobuf(3.x)-->
<!-- excluding this so that KPL's Protobuf version is honored for testing and parsing messages.-->
<!-- This means we are not yet utilizing the integration of GSR Library with KCL yet. -->
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.google.protobuf</groupId>
<artifactId>protobuf-java</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 143 to 145
if (shards.size() > 0) {
shards.get(shards.size() - 1).getShardId();
shards.get(shards.size() - 1).shardId();
}
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These doesn't seem to do anything. I kept it because it was this way originally.

@mrdziuban
Copy link

Is there any chance this will get merged soon @YangSan0622? I think it will also unblock awslabs/amazon-kinesis-client#1163

@mrdziuban
Copy link

Trying again here, @YangSan0622 or @blacktooth what do you think about merging/releasing this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants