Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add test for single route single utterance #488

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 15, 2024

Conversation

jamescalam
Copy link
Member

@jamescalam jamescalam commented Dec 15, 2024

PR Type

Tests


Description

  • Added a new pytest fixture route_single_utterance to provide a single route with one utterance for testing purposes.
  • Implemented a new test test_initialization_single_utterance to verify the behavior of SemanticRouter when initialized with a single utterance route.
  • The test ensures the correct score threshold is set and validates the number of utterances in the index.
  • Included a conditional sleep for PineconeIndex to allow index updates during the test.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Tests
test_router.py
Add test for single route with single utterance                   

tests/unit/test_router.py

  • Added a new pytest fixture route_single_utterance for a single route
    with one utterance.
  • Introduced a new test method test_initialization_single_utterance to
    validate the initialization of a single utterance route in
    SemanticRouter.
  • Ensured the test checks the score threshold and the number of
    utterances in the index.
  • +20/-0   

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Code Smell
    The conditional sleep for PineconeIndex in test_initialization_single_utterance might introduce flakiness in tests. Consider refactoring to avoid relying on time.sleep.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    General
    Add a condition to check if PINECONE_SLEEP is defined and greater than zero before calling time.sleep

    Ensure that the time.sleep(PINECONE_SLEEP) call is conditional on PINECONE_SLEEP
    being defined and greater than zero to avoid potential runtime errors or unnecessary
    delays.

    tests/unit/test_router.py [270-271]

    -if index_cls is PineconeIndex:
    +if index_cls is PineconeIndex and PINECONE_SLEEP > 0:
         time.sleep(PINECONE_SLEEP)  # allow for index to be updated
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion improves the robustness of the code by ensuring that time.sleep is only called when PINECONE_SLEEP is defined and greater than zero, preventing potential runtime errors or unnecessary delays. This is particularly relevant in cases where PINECONE_SLEEP might not be properly initialized or set to an invalid value.

    7

    Copy link

    codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2024

    Codecov Report

    All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

    Project coverage is 73.75%. Comparing base (5bf6388) to head (ec78a75).
    Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

    Additional details and impacted files
    @@           Coverage Diff           @@
    ##             main     #488   +/-   ##
    =======================================
      Coverage   73.75%   73.75%           
    =======================================
      Files          43       43           
      Lines        3585     3585           
    =======================================
      Hits         2644     2644           
      Misses        941      941           

    ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
    📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

    @jamescalam jamescalam changed the base branch from main to ashraq/fix-vector-shape December 15, 2024 10:33
    @jamescalam jamescalam merged commit 8f0f65b into ashraq/fix-vector-shape Dec 15, 2024
    3 of 7 checks passed
    @jamescalam jamescalam deleted the james/single-utt-test branch December 15, 2024 10:33
    @jamescalam jamescalam restored the james/single-utt-test branch December 15, 2024 10:42
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant