Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: wrong type of payload and headers in MessageExample #3531

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Pakisan
Copy link
Member

@Pakisan Pakisan commented Dec 31, 2024

According to JSON Schema headers and payload properties may be of any type

Fixes #3530

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated AsyncAPI Specification documentation for Message Example Object
    • Expanded type definitions for headers and payload fields to provide more flexibility in message example structures

According to JSON Schema headers and payload properties may be of any type

asyncapi#3530
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the AsyncAPI Specification documentation for the Message Example Object. Specifically, the changes modify the type declarations for headers and payload fields from Map[string, any] to any. This adjustment provides more flexibility in defining message examples by allowing a broader range of acceptable structures for these fields.

Changes

File Change Summary
markdown/docs/reference/specification/v3.0.0.md Updated type declarations for headers and payload in Message Example Object from Map[string, any] to any

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Correct type for headers and payload in MessageExample [#3530]

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of docs so bright,
Types transformed with coding might,
headers and payload now free to roam,
In AsyncAPI's flexible home!
Flexibility wins the day! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e1df5f3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/6773ec2c31b77d0008a7e28f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3531--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (fb0a3bf) to head (e1df5f3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3531   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           19        19           
  Lines          668       668           
=========================================
  Hits           668       668           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:

Category Score
🔴 Performance 47
🟢 Accessibility 98
🟢 Best practices 92
🟢 SEO 100
🔴 PWA 33

Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3531--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
markdown/docs/reference/specification/v3.0.0.md (1)

1338-1339: LGTM! The type change correctly aligns with JSON Schema specifications.

The change from Map[string, any] to any for both headers and payload fields is correct as it:

  1. Aligns with JSON Schema's flexibility
  2. Supports real-world use cases where headers/payload might be primitives, arrays, or other non-object types
  3. Fixes the type constraint that was incorrectly limiting these fields to only object types

Consider adding an example in the Message Example Object Example section that demonstrates non-object types for headers and payload, such as:

name: SimpleMessage
summary: Example with non-object types
headers: "correlation-123" # string header
payload: 42 # number payload
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb0a3bf and e1df5f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • markdown/docs/reference/specification/v3.0.0.md (2 hunks)

Copy link
Collaborator

@TRohit20 TRohit20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Docs Bug 🐞 report]: wrong type of payload and headers in MessageExample
3 participants