docs: added content for securing operations #2172
Conversation
BhaswatiRoy
requested review from
quetzalliwrites and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
✅ Deploy Preview for shimmering-choux-eb0798 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
BhaswatiRoy
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rohit <[email protected]>
| The security property is an array where you can define one or more security requirement objects. | ||
|
|
||
| For example, let's say you have an AsyncAPI document with a channel called users and two operations within that channel: createUser and getUser. | ||
| The server-level security is set to use API key authentication for all operations within all channels. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you cannot enforce as it is not about overriding,
it is like providing alternative for what is already in the server. Of course you can do a server without security, then have different operations and channels on the same server, each operation with different security - still, it is not overriding/enforcing if you know what I mean
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am unable to understand how to improve the content as per your suggestions.
could you please attach some examples or maybe give me a bit more info about the same?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you cannot enforce as it is not about overriding,
it is like providing alternative for what is already in the server. Of course you can do a server without security, then have different operations and channels on the same server, each operation with different security - still, it is not overriding/enforcing if you know what I mean
I have removed the line that stated about enforcing/overriding, though not sure if I still was able to resolved the suggestion.
|
Hello @derberg thanks for your review, I have implemented the suggested changes. Do please let me know if I need to add/remove anything else. |
Fix: #1513
Content:
Operations Security
Implementation
Work: GSoD 2023 issue
Continuation: #1881