Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Problem: processingMCP seems to be ignored #76

Closed
sevein opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #85
Closed

Problem: processingMCP seems to be ignored #76

sevein opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #85

Comments

@sevein
Copy link
Member

sevein commented Sep 2, 2020

Also, we may just want to ditch support for this file in favor of request-scoped configuration attributes (see #55).
sevein added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2020
@sevein
Add request-scoped processing config
98f05f1 
This commit removes support for processingMCP.xml. Instead, users are
asked to submit the processing configuration via the API. The workflow
had a couple of now unused link types removed and added a new LinkChoice
type removing the need of workflow chains.

Fixes #76.
@sevein sevein mentioned this issue Oct 27, 2020
Merged
sevein added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2020
@sevein
Add request-scoped processing config
e2dbb6c 
This commit removes support for processingMCP.xml. Instead, users are
asked to submit the processing configuration via the API. The workflow
had a couple of now unused link types removed and added a new LinkChoice
type removing the need of workflow chains.

Fixes #76.
sevein added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2020
@sevein
Add request-scoped processing config
adb7fb1 
This commit removes support for processingMCP.xml. Instead, users are
asked to submit the processing configuration via the API. The workflow
had a couple of now unused link types removed and added a new LinkChoice
type removing the need of workflow chains.

Fixes #76.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add request-scoped processing config artefactual-labs/a3m
1 participant
@sevein