Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add e2e tests for apps in any namespace feature #844

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ishitasequeira
Copy link
Contributor

Add e2e tests for apps in any namespace feature

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.48%. Comparing base (0c9c0a9) to head (63f6c48).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #844      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.47%   73.48%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        3114     3142      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits         2288     2309      +21     
- Misses        692      695       +3     
- Partials      134      138       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Ishita Sequeira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ishita Sequeira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ishita Sequeira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ishita Sequeira <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@jannfis jannfis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@chengfang are your concerns all resolved?

Signed-off-by: Ishita Sequeira <[email protected]>
@ishitasequeira
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jannfis @chengfang We would need the PR #854 to be merged in. I tested the e2e test with the code changes in the PR and it works successfully.

I will check with the contributor to fix the unit tests in the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants