new: use _graphs
instead of nxadb_graphs
#66
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scratches
nxadb_graphs
in favour of the_graphs
system collection.We once spoke about using this, but stopped because we couldn't guarantee that the database user has access to
_graphs
.This is still valid, but I am suggesting we simply parameterize the Graph Collection Name (and have it by default set to
_graphs
), instead of polluting every user DB with annxadb_graphs
collection.IMO this is much cleaner. We no longer need to manually delete a graph from
nxadb_graphs
once a Graph has been removed from_graphs
, which was getting annoying.Functionality remains the same, we simply embed the Graph Properties of the
nxadb.Graph
object under a a field callednetworkx
within the associated_graph
document. UX does not change, user doesn't even need to know about thisnetworkx
nested field.