Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better clarify excludeAll statement #129

Merged

Conversation

mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor

Current wording is misleading

Copy link
Contributor

@pjfanning pjfanning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

README.md Outdated
> JDK 11 reference, i.e. if you need to use sbt-site-paradox you would do the
> following
> resolved dependencies that rely on JDK 11+, i.e. if you need to use
> * sbt-site-paradox you would do the following
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't that * start a new bullet?

Suggested change
> * sbt-site-paradox you would do the following
> sbt-site-paradox you would do the following

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pickup

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved + force pushed

@mdedetrich mdedetrich force-pushed the better-clarify-excludeAll-statement branch from 73ee528 to 02f51be Compare March 4, 2024 15:42
@mdedetrich mdedetrich merged commit 810043f into apache:main Mar 4, 2024
5 checks passed
@mdedetrich mdedetrich deleted the better-clarify-excludeAll-statement branch March 4, 2024 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants