-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 361
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CELEBORN-1711][TEST] Fix flaky test caused by master/worker setup issue #2906
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
12e3d19
to
8555887
Compare
8555887
to
54fc584
Compare
54fc584
to
9ed757f
Compare
9ed757f
to
2a3b7da
Compare
|
|
48025b3
to
5b3c7d0
Compare
dd1e191
to
f0ce882
Compare
|
7088ead
to
03b0282
Compare
cc @FMX @RexXiong @SteNicholas It is to reduce the flaky test failures. |
gentle ping @FMX @RexXiong @SteNicholas |
Seems the port conflicts issue happen with high frequency recently. Hope this patch can help reduce it. |
master/src/test/scala/org/apache/celeborn/service/deploy/master/MasterClusterFeature.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
feb3ac5
to
c462899
Compare
…ception reduce sleep time not needed remove unused used ports nit sleep and then check timeout and config the timeout retest please do not sleep check portBounded more random worker ports retest please synchronized shutdown increase timeout
c462899
to
c92199e
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2906 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 32.07% 32.52% +0.46%
==========================================
Files 331 334 +3
Lines 19749 19940 +191
Branches 1778 1799 +21
==========================================
+ Hits 6332 6484 +152
- Misses 13071 13096 +25
- Partials 346 360 +14 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
To fix flaky test.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
GA.