Add action_groups

[mariolenz]

SUMMARY

Add action_groups:

pip install black jsonschema jinja2==3.0.3 boto3 baron redbaron ruamel.yaml autoflake
git clone https://github.com/mariolenz/ansible.content_builder.git
cd ansible.content_builder
ansible-galaxy collection install .
cd -
git clone https://github.com/mariolenz/vmware.vmware_rest.git
mkdir -p /collections/ansible_collections/vmware/vmware_rest/tests
cp -r vmware.vmware_rest/tests/sanity /collections/ansible_collections/vmware/vmware_rest/tests
ansible-playbook build.yaml -e manifest_file=MANIFEST.yaml
cd vmware.vmware_rest/
git branch add_action_groups
git checkout add_action_groups
cp /collections/ansible_collections/vmware/vmware_rest/meta/runtime.yml meta/
echo -e '---\nminor_changes:\n- Add action_groups (https://github.com/ansible-collections/vmware.vmware_rest/issues/440).' > changelogs/fragments/440_add-action_groups.yaml
git add --all
git commit -m "Add action_groups"
git push --set-upstream origin add_action_groups

build.yaml:

---
- hosts: localhost
  gather_facts: yes
  roles:
    - ansible.content_builder.run

MANIFEST.yaml:

---
collection:
  requires_ansible: "2.14.0"
  path: /collections/ansible_collections/vmware/vmware_rest
  namespace: vmware
  name: vmware_rest
plugins:
  - type: module_openapi
    name: "vmware_rest"
    content: cloud
    api_object_path: vmware.vmware_rest/config/api_specifications/7.0.3
    resource: vmware.vmware_rest/config
    action: generate_all
    unique_key: ""
    rm_swagger_json: ""
    module_version: "1.0.0"
    author: "Ansible Cloud Team"

ISSUE TYPE

• Feature Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

meta/runtime.yml

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

#361
#440

cc @alinabuzachis @Yannik

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 34.18%. Comparing base (b757870) to head (a6b1311).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #475   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   34.18%   34.18%           
=======================================
  Files         143      143           
  Lines       11040    11040           
  Branches     2291     2291           
=======================================
  Hits         3774     3774           
  Misses       7266     7266           

Flag	Coverage Δ
sanity	34.18% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[softwarefactory-project-zuul]

Build succeeded.
https://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/b3ea86a315eb43ceb5272a8436e7e376

✔️ build-ansible-collection SUCCESS in 11m 37s
✔️ tox-cloud-refresh-examples-vmware SUCCESS in 10m 48s
✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 5m 14s

[softwarefactory-project-zuul]

Build succeeded.
https://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/f8b6046f7e1440bdb027ea46d6f34428

✔️ build-ansible-collection SUCCESS in 10m 44s
✔️ tox-cloud-refresh-examples-vmware SUCCESS in 10m 58s
✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 5m 10s

[alinabuzachis]

@mariolenz I guess we should probably implement a functionality for this in the content_builder to automatically generate the list.

[mariolenz]

I guess we should probably implement a functionality for this in the content_builder to automatically generate the list.

@alinabuzachis ansible-community/ansible.content_builder#78

I wonder why the action_groups didn't turn up in #481. Is my code buggy?

BTW As far as I understand from a discussion in the Ansible Community Working Group chat, it's planned to phase out content_builder. Do you know anything about this? (ansible/ansible-creator#106)

[mariolenz]

Closing in favor of #489 which contains action_groups.