-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
static_routes - Ensure idempotency with encapsulated interfaces (e.g TenGigE0/0/0/23.1234) #507
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
… TenGigE0/0/0/23.1234)
Any news on status here? Will this move to next release? |
hey @weippertt can you please add an integration test as well to validate this change? |
Currently i try to figure out how to add the proper integration tests and also how to test them in advance, but i have not found the correct answers yet. any hints are welcome. |
@Ruchip16 is the integration test added valid and enough for merging? |
SUMMARY
Static Routes with encapsulated Interfaces seems not idempotent, this adds the regex to
recognise also interfaces with . in the name
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
static_routes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
idempotency with static_routes on encapsulated interfaces