Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes parsing of macro invocations in Lists and SExps and some cases … #654
Fixes parsing of macro invocations in Lists and SExps and some cases … #654
Changes from 1 commit
75909fa
7aea3aa
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗺️ Because this delegated to
match_sexp_value
(implied_1_0
), it would use the Ion 1.0 matchers for matching anything that is not an E-Expression inside a S-Expression, which caused this to happen:The solution was to copy/paste the content from
match_sexp_value
, changing it to usematch_value_1_1
instead ofmatch_value_1_0
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗺️ I added
match_struct_1_1
, so it got updated here, insidematch_value_1_1
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗺️ Same problem here as in
match_sexp_value_1_1
. Fixed by copy/pasting the content ofmatch_list_value
, and altering this line to point tomatch_annotated_value_1_1
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗺️ Because
match_ion_struct
was usingRawTextStructIterator_1_1
, it was theoretically possible that Ion 1.0 would accept E-Expressions as long as they were found inside a struct.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗺️ This is basically a copy/paste of
match_struct
, but it usesRawTextStructIterator_1_1
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗺️ This is a developer experience improvement. It causes a test failure to print the whole error, not just "Unexpected parse fail for input".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗺️ I added some tests for Ion 1.1 SExps and Lists, as well as some test cases for E-Expressions that are nested inside other things. This is far from comprehensive, but it's at least an improvement.