-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 474
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ERL: Use IP address instead of IP:port pair #6176
Draft
algorandskiy
wants to merge
2
commits into
algorand:master
Choose a base branch
from
algorandskiy:pavel/erl-ip-addr
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's say you have N conns per IP, ERL sets up the closeReservation(wsPeer) is called by the wsPeer's OnClose() handler for each of N conns (not per IP) so you will end up calling delete multiple times for each conn (not per IP) and also, the capacity that is reserved for this IP (CapacityPerReservation) will be returned N times
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually, since N conns are sharing one erl.capacityByClient[IP] entry, ERL will only call wsPeer.OnClose() when it sees the IP missing from the map. So that means if the first conn goes away, it will return the CapacityPerReservation back and delete itself from the map, even though the other conns are still running.
I think there needs to be an implementation of the ErlClient interface, like a meta-client, that manages setting OnClose() handlers for all the wsPeers sharing the same IP, something like that, and function that takes a wsPeer and looks it up by IP, and returns a IPBasedERLClient impl to pass to ConsumeCapacity(c ErlClient). Then when the IPBasedErlClient notices all the child wsPeers have called OnClose, it calls its own OnClose, which in turns calls ERL.closeReservation()