Create one tutorial/example notebook

[kallewesterling]

I am creating a draft PR here so it's easier to have a conversation about what this looks like.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions]

Coverage report

Click to see where and how coverage changed

File	Statements	Missing	Coverage	Coverage (new stmts)	Lines missing
autoemulate
compare.py
experimental_design.py
plotting.py					96-97, 270
Project Total

This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action

[mastoffel]

@kallewesterling I'm still having the issue that the logs are rendered in different boxes rather than all together. I've merged you're previous PR but ch = logging.StreamHandler(sys.stdout) doesn't seem to work for me. Would you mind trying whether it looks alright for you?

[mastoffel]

Also just to summarise:

1. Modified quickstart
2. Added Tutorial
3. Slightly changed save_model() method to take a model instead of saving the best model

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (28541d5) 91.62% compared to head (89d0ca3) 91.51%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
autoemulate/compare.py	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #153      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.62%   91.51%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines        1790     1792       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         1640     1640              
- Misses        150      152       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kallewesterling]

@mastoffel Should we open this as a real PR?

[mastoffel]

@kallewesterling yes, I think so. I'm currently working on another PR which will change the tutorials slightly, so will do that first and then give the tutorials an overhaul.

[mastoffel]

A few more changes, mainly:

• worked on quickstart.ipynb
• worked on 01_start.ipynb (more in depth tutorial)
  @kallewesterling @bryanlimy any comments on those two tutorials would be appreciated!

There are a few more changes in here (which should have probably been in another PR), but nothing big.

[kallewesterling]

Thanks @mastoffel -- I'll try to have a look at this today so we can get this PR approved before the end of the sprint!

[bryanlimy]

LGTM for quickstart and 01_start.ipynb

[mastoffel]

@kallewesterling did you have a chance to look at the tutorials? If not, I think it should be ok to merge. They'll get a re-write anyway soon.

[kallewesterling]

I haven't had a chance, no, sorry. Quite pressed for time currently and will need to adjust the expectations in the next sprint. I'm happy with incremental dev on these things though! Feel free to merge.