website: Added error boundary to find cause of errors #2182
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve a complete restructuring of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #2182 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 5 5
Branches 2 2
=========================================
Hits 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
website/frontend/index.js (2)
15-17: Excellent implementation of ErrorBoundary.The ErrorBoundary component is correctly placed to wrap the entire App, which will catch any errors that occur within the application. This is a solid approach to improving error handling and debugging.
A small suggestion: Consider passing a prop to ErrorBoundary to customize the error message or provide a way to report errors to a logging service. This could enhance the error handling capabilities further.
Here's an example of how you might enhance the ErrorBoundary usage:
<React.StrictMode> - <ErrorBoundary> + <ErrorBoundary onError={(error) => logErrorToService(error)}> <App /> </ErrorBoundary> </React.StrictMode>This assumes you have a
logErrorToServicefunction defined elsewhere in your application. If not, you'd need to implement it.
1-20: Overall, great job on implementing the ErrorBoundary!The changes you've made are concise, focused, and effectively introduce error handling to the application. This aligns well with the PR objective of finding the cause of errors.
One small suggestion to round this off: Consider adding a brief comment above the ErrorBoundary usage explaining its purpose. This can be helpful for other developers who might work on this file in the future.
Here's an example of how you might add a comment:
if (rootElement) { const root = createRoot(rootElement); + // ErrorBoundary wraps the App to catch and handle any errors that occur during rendering root.render( <React.StrictMode> <ErrorBoundary> <App /> </ErrorBoundary> </React.StrictMode> ); }website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx (3)
4-8: Clean state initialization, but consider type safety.The state structure looks good and uses modern class property syntax. Nice work! For an extra layer of robustness, you might want to consider adding PropTypes or TypeScript to enforce type safety.
Would you like me to demonstrate how to add PropTypes to this component?
10-19: Solid error handling implementation, but consider production-ready logging.Your error boundary methods are well-implemented. The console logging in
componentDidCatchis great for development. For production, you might want to integrate with an error tracking service like Sentry or LogRocket.Here's a quick example of how you might integrate with an error tracking service:
componentDidCatch(error, errorInfo) { // Still log to console for development console.error('Caught an error:', error, errorInfo); // Send to error tracking service if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') { ErrorTrackingService.logError(error, errorInfo); } this.setState({ error, errorInfo }); }
21-40: Well-structured render method with room for UI polish.Your render method is logically sound and follows best practices, especially by limiting detailed error info to development mode. Kudos on that!
A couple of suggestions to enhance the UI:
- Consider using a monospace font for error details to improve readability.
- You might want to add a "Report this error" button for users in production.
Here's a quick example of how you might implement these suggestions:
render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return ( <div className="text-center p-6"> <h1 className="text-2xl font-bold text-red-600">Something went wrong.</h1> <p className="text-gray-700 mt-4">An error occurred, and we are working to fix it.</p> {process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? ( <details className="whitespace-pre-wrap text-sm text-left mt-4"> <summary className="cursor-pointer">Error Details</summary> <pre className="font-mono mt-2"> {this.state.error && this.state.error.toString()} <br /> {this.state.errorInfo && this.state.errorInfo.componentStack} </pre> </details> ) : ( <button className="mt-4 px-4 py-2 bg-blue-500 text-white rounded hover:bg-blue-600" onClick={() => {/* Implement error reporting logic */}} > Report this error </button> )} </div> ); } return this.props.children; }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 30-30: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/AirQo_Data.js (1)
240-257: Nicely done on improving the robustness of the scroll handling!The changes you've made to the
handleScrollfunction are solid. They prevent potential runtime errors and unnecessary state updates. Here's a quick rundown of the improvements:
- Checking for
sectionsexistence and length.- Filtering out null elements when mapping over sections.
- Checking if there are any section elements before proceeding.
- Only updating the
activeSectionstate when it changes.These changes make the code more resilient and efficient. Well done!
Consider this minor optimization to reduce the number of array iterations:
const sectionElements = sections.reduce((acc, section) => { const element = document.getElementById(section.id); if (element !== null) acc.push(element); return acc; }, []);This combines the
mapandfilteroperations into a singlereduce, potentially improving performance for larger section arrays.website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/PrivacyPolicy.js (2)
221-221: Correct capitalization in the contact informationIn your text, "You can contact..." should have "you" in lowercase to maintain consistent capitalization.
Apply this diff to correct the sentence:
- If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, You can contact our designated Data Protection Officer through: + If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, you can contact our designated Data Protection Officer through:
272-274: Update the 'Last Updated' date to reflect recent changesThe Privacy Policy notes that it was last updated on "Nov 22, 2022". Since changes have been made, consider updating this date to reflect the current version of the policy.
Apply this diff to update the date:
- <strong>This Privacy Policy was last updated on Nov 22, 2022</strong> + <strong>This Privacy Policy was last updated on [Current Date]</strong>Replace
[Current Date]with the actual date of the latest update.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
website/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- website/frontend/App.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/index.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/AirQo_Data.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/AirQo_Payments.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/PrivacyPolicy.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/TermsOfService.js (1 hunks)
- website/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- website/frontend/App.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx
[error] 30-30: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
website/frontend/index.js (1)
6-6: Nicely done with the ErrorBoundary import.The import statement for the ErrorBoundary component is correctly placed and follows the established pattern in the file. Good job keeping the imports organized.
website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx (2)
1-3: Solid start with proper imports and class declaration.The imports are spot-on, and the ErrorBoundary class is correctly set up as a React component. Good job on following React conventions here.
43-43: Clean and standard export.The default export of the ErrorBoundary component is spot-on. It follows the common practice for exporting React components.
website/package.json (2)
1-109: Discrepancy between PR objectives and package.json changesI've noticed that the PR description mentions adding an error boundary to find the cause of errors, but the only change in the package.json file is updating the webpack-dev-server version. This seems a bit disconnected from the stated objectives.
A few questions come to mind:
- Are there other files in this PR that implement the error boundary?
- Is this webpack-dev-server update a prerequisite for implementing the error boundary?
- If this update is unrelated to the error boundary, should it be in a separate PR for easier tracking and potential rollback if needed?
Let's check if there are other files in this PR that might be implementing the error boundary:
If this webpack-dev-server update is indeed separate from the error boundary implementation, consider splitting it into a separate PR. This would make it easier to manage and review changes, especially when they serve different purposes.
✅ Verification successful
Issues with Previous Shell Script Execution
The initial shell script encountered errors due to incorrect commands:
- Typographical Error: The command
oshould beechoto display messages.- Missing
npm: Thenpmcommand was not found in the sandbox environment.To address these issues, please run the following corrected shell scripts to gather the necessary information:
Error Boundary Implementation Confirmed
The PR successfully includes the implementation of the error boundary in
website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx, aligning with the stated objectives.Regarding the update to
webpack-dev-serverversion^5.1.0, if this change is not directly related to the error boundary, it might be beneficial to separate it into its own PR for better tracking and easier rollback if necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other changed files in the PR gh pr view 2182 --json files --jq '.files[].path'Length of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to list changed files in PR #2182 gh pr view 2182 --json files --jq '.files[].path'Length of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the webpack-dev-server version from package.json grep '"webpack-dev-server":' website/package.json | grep -oP '(?<="webpack-dev-server": ")[^"]+'Length of output: 105
80-80: Heads up on the webpack-dev-server major version update.I see you've bumped webpack-dev-server from ^4.15.1 to ^5.1.0. That's quite a leap! While staying up-to-date is generally good, major version updates can sometimes bring breaking changes.
A few things to consider:
- Have you checked the changelog for any breaking changes or new features that might affect our setup?
- It would be wise to thoroughly test the development environment to ensure everything still works as expected.
- This change doesn't seem directly related to the error boundary mentioned in the PR description. Can you clarify the reasoning behind this update?
Let's double-check if this update is compatible with our current webpack version:
Also, it might be a good idea to update the PR description to mention this dependency update, as it's a significant change that wasn't initially described.
✅ Verification successful
Webpack and Webpack-dev-server versions are compatible.
The
webpackversion is set to^5.89.0andwebpack-dev-serverhas been updated to^5.1.0. Both are on major version 5, which ensures compatibility between them.Ensure to run your development environment tests to confirm everything operates smoothly with the updated versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check webpack and webpack-dev-server versions echo "Webpack version:" npm list webpack echo "Webpack-dev-server version:" npm list webpack-dev-serverLength of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract webpack and webpack-dev-server versions from package.json echo "Webpack version:" jq -r '.dependencies.webpack // .devDependencies.webpack' website/package.json echo "Webpack-dev-server version:" jq -r '.dependencies["webpack-dev-server"] // .devDependencies["webpack-dev-server"]' website/package.jsonLength of output: 312
website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx
Outdated
| {this.state.error && this.state.error.toString()} | ||
| <br /> | ||
| {this.state.errorInfo && this.state.errorInfo.componentStack} | ||
| </details> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using optional chaining for more concise error handling.
The static analysis tool suggests using optional chaining, which can make your code more concise and robust. While your current implementation is not incorrect, optional chaining can help prevent potential "cannot read property of undefined" errors.
Here's how you could implement this:
{this.state.error?.toString()}
<br />
{this.state.errorInfo?.componentStack}This change ensures that toString() is only called if this.state.error exists, and componentStack is only accessed if this.state.errorInfo exists.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 30-30: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| if (!sections || sections.length === 0) return; | ||
|
|
||
| const sectionElements = sections | ||
| .map((section) => document.getElementById(section.id)) | ||
| .filter((element) => element !== null); // Filter out null elements | ||
|
|
||
| if (sectionElements.length === 0) return; | ||
|
|
||
| const currentSection = sectionElements.find((element) => { | ||
| const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect(); | ||
| return rect.top <= 100 && rect.bottom > 100; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (currentSection) { | ||
| if (currentSection && currentSection.id !== activeSection) { | ||
| setActiveSection(currentSection.id); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| window.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
| return () => window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
| }, [sections]); | ||
|
|
||
| // Clean up event listener on component unmount | ||
| return () => { | ||
| window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
| }; | ||
| }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Kudos on the scroll handling improvements, but let's tweak that dependency array.
Great job on enhancing the scroll handling logic! The new checks and conditions make the code more robust and efficient. I particularly appreciate the early returns for edge cases and the prevention of unnecessary state updates. The cleanup function is also a nice touch – always good to keep things tidy.
However, I noticed a small hiccup in the dependency array. Including setActiveSection isn't necessary and could lead to unexpected re-renders. Let's make a small adjustment:
- }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]);
+ }, [sections, activeSection]);This change will ensure the effect runs only when sections or activeSection change, which is what we want. setActiveSection is stable across renders, so including it doesn't add any value.
Keep up the great work! These improvements will definitely contribute to a smoother user experience.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!sections || sections.length === 0) return; | |
| const sectionElements = sections | |
| .map((section) => document.getElementById(section.id)) | |
| .filter((element) => element !== null); // Filter out null elements | |
| if (sectionElements.length === 0) return; | |
| const currentSection = sectionElements.find((element) => { | |
| const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect(); | |
| return rect.top <= 100 && rect.bottom > 100; | |
| }); | |
| if (currentSection) { | |
| if (currentSection && currentSection.id !== activeSection) { | |
| setActiveSection(currentSection.id); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| window.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | |
| return () => window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | |
| }, [sections]); | |
| // Clean up event listener on component unmount | |
| return () => { | |
| window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | |
| }; | |
| }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]); | |
| if (!sections || sections.length === 0) return; | |
| const sectionElements = sections | |
| .map((section) => document.getElementById(section.id)) | |
| .filter((element) => element !== null); // Filter out null elements | |
| if (sectionElements.length === 0) return; | |
| const currentSection = sectionElements.find((element) => { | |
| const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect(); | |
| return rect.top <= 100 && rect.bottom > 100; | |
| }); | |
| if (currentSection && currentSection.id !== activeSection) { | |
| setActiveSection(currentSection.id); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| window.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | |
| // Clean up event listener on component unmount | |
| return () => { | |
| window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | |
| }; | |
| }, [sections, activeSection]); |
| return () => { | ||
| window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
| }; | ||
| }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize the useEffect dependency array
The dependency array of the useEffect hook includes setActiveSection, which is unnecessary. As a state updater function provided by useState, it's guaranteed to be stable across re-renders. Including it might cause unnecessary effect re-runs.
Consider removing setActiveSection from the dependency array:
}, [sections, activeSection]);This change will prevent potential unnecessary re-runs of the effect while maintaining the same functionality.
| <p> | ||
| To ensure equitable access to AirQo's data and to prevent misuse, the following rate | ||
| limits are in place: | ||
| </p> | ||
| <ul className="list-disc pl-6 mt-2"> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <strong>Fair Use</strong>: AirQo data is provided for the benefit of all users. | ||
| Excessive or malicious use that disrupts service availability for others is | ||
| prohibited. We reserve the right to monitor usage and take appropriate action, | ||
| including limiting or terminating access to users who do not comply with these Terms. | ||
| </li> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <strong>Request Limits</strong>: AirQo may implement variable rate limits on API | ||
| requests based on factors such as server load, number of API requests, number of sites | ||
| and network regions, the nature of your usage, and overall demand for the service. | ||
| These limits are designed to ensure fair access for all users. Exceeding the | ||
| applicable limit may result in temporary or permanent suspension of your access to the | ||
| API. | ||
| </li> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <strong>Non-Commercial</strong>: You may not use the data for commercial purposes | ||
| without obtaining prior written permission from AirQo. | ||
| </li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </> | ||
| ) | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'restrictions', | ||
| title: '5. Restrictions', | ||
| content: ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <p>While the data is openly licensed, the following restrictions apply:</p> | ||
| <ul className="list-disc pl-6 mt-2"> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <strong>No Endorsement</strong>: You may not imply that AirQo endorses your use of the | ||
| data or any derivative works. | ||
| </li> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <strong>No Misuse</strong>: You may not use the data in any way that is illegal, | ||
| harmful, or violates the rights of others. | ||
| </li> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <strong>No Automated Data Scraping</strong>: Use of automated tools to scrape data at | ||
| a rate exceeding the allowed limits is strictly prohibited. | ||
| </li> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <strong>No Commercial Use</strong>: You may not use the data for commercial purposes | ||
| without obtaining prior written permission from AirQo. This includes but is not | ||
| limited to selling the data, using it in commercial products, or incorporating it into | ||
| services that you charge for. | ||
| </li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </> | ||
| ) | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'disclaimer', | ||
| title: '6. Disclaimer of Warranties', | ||
| content: ( | ||
| <p> | ||
| AirQo provides the data "as is" without any warranties of any kind, either express or | ||
| implied. AirQo does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or availability of the data | ||
| at all times. | ||
| </p> | ||
| ) | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'liability', | ||
| title: '7. Limitation of Liability', | ||
| content: ( | ||
| <p> | ||
| To the fullest extent permitted by law, AirQo shall not be liable for any damages, losses, | ||
| or liabilities arising from your use of the data, including but not limited to direct, | ||
| indirect, incidental, punitive, and consequential damages. | ||
| </p> | ||
| ) | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'modifications', | ||
| title: '8. Modifications to the Terms', | ||
| content: ( | ||
| <p> | ||
| AirQo reserves the right to modify these Terms at any time. Any changes will be effective | ||
| immediately upon posting on our website. Your continued use of the data following the | ||
| posting of changes constitutes your acceptance of those changes. | ||
| </p> | ||
| ) | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'contact', | ||
| title: '9. Contact Information', | ||
| content: ( | ||
| <p> | ||
| If you have any questions about these Terms, please contact us at{' '} | ||
| <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>. | ||
| </p> | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider moving the sections array to a separate file
The sections array is quite large and contains a lot of static content. To improve the maintainability and readability of this component, it would be beneficial to move this array to a separate file.
Create a new file, perhaps named airQoDataSections.js, and move the sections array there. Then import it into this component:
import { sections } from './airQoDataSections';This separation of concerns will make the component easier to understand and maintain.
| The data provided by AirQo is licensed under the Creative Commons{' '} | ||
| <a | ||
| href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" | ||
| target="_blank" | ||
| rel="noopener noreferrer"> | ||
| Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) | ||
| </a> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review external links for security
The link to the Creative Commons license is currently set to open in a new tab without any security attributes. While this is generally fine for trusted sites like Creative Commons, it's a good practice to add security attributes to external links.
Consider adding the rel="noopener noreferrer" attribute to the link:
<a
href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer">
Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
</a>This helps prevent potential security vulnerabilities associated with opening links in new tabs.
| <a | ||
| key={section.id} | ||
| href={`#${section.id}`} | ||
| className={activeSection === section.id ? 'active' : ''} | ||
| onClick={(e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| setActiveSection(section.id); | ||
| document.getElementById(section.id).scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth' }); | ||
| }}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve accessibility by revising anchor tag usage
You're using anchor tags <a> with href attributes but preventing their default behavior using e.preventDefault() and handling scrolling manually. This practice can negatively impact accessibility and user experience. Consider allowing the default browser behavior or switching to buttons for better semantics.
Option 1: Allow the default anchor behavior for better accessibility.
<a
key={section.id}
href={`#${section.id}`}
className={activeSection === section.id ? 'active' : ''}
- onClick={(e) => {
- e.preventDefault();
- setActiveSection(section.id);
- document.getElementById(section.id).scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth' });
- }}>
+ >
{section.title}
</a>Option 2: Use buttons if you need custom scroll behavior.
- <a
+ <button
key={section.id}
className={activeSection === section.id ? 'active' : ''}
onClick={() => {
setActiveSection(section.id);
document.getElementById(section.id).scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth' });
}}>
{section.title}
- </a>
+ </button>Ensure you update the styling to maintain the desired appearance.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const handleScroll = () => { | ||
| if (!sections || sections.length === 0) return; | ||
|
|
||
| const sectionElements = sections | ||
| .map((section) => document.getElementById(section.id)) | ||
| .filter((element) => element !== null); // Filter out null elements | ||
|
|
||
| if (sectionElements.length === 0) return; | ||
|
|
||
| const currentSection = sectionElements.find((element) => { | ||
| const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect(); | ||
| return rect.top <= 100 && rect.bottom > 100; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (currentSection && currentSection.id !== activeSection) { | ||
| setActiveSection(currentSection.id); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| window.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
|
|
||
| // Clean up event listener on component unmount | ||
| return () => { | ||
| window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
| }; | ||
| }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize useEffect dependencies and memoize 'sections' array
The sections array is redefined on every render, which can cause the useEffect hook to trigger unnecessarily and may impact performance. Since sections is a static array, consider memoizing it using useMemo to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
Also, the setActiveSection function provided by useState is stable and doesn't need to be included in the dependency array of useEffect.
Apply this diff to memoize sections and adjust the dependency array:
+ import React, { useState, useEffect, useMemo } from 'react';
...
+ const sections = useMemo(() => [
{
id: 'intro',
title: 'Introduction',
content: (
<>
{/* ...content... */}
</>
)
},
// ...other sections...
], []);
...
- }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]);
+ }, [activeSection]);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| onClick={(e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| setActiveSection(section.id); | ||
| document.getElementById(section.id).scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth' }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid directly manipulating the DOM with scrollIntoView.
While calling element.scrollIntoView() works, React provides the ref forwarding mechanism to handle such cases more elegantly. This keeps your code more in line with React's declarative paradigm.
You might refactor the onClick handler to use refs:
onClick={(e) => {
e.preventDefault();
setActiveSection(section.id);
- document.getElementById(section.id).scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth' });
+ sectionRefs[section.id].current.scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth' });
}}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| .map((section) => document.getElementById(section.id)) | ||
| .filter((element) => element !== null); // Filter out null elements | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using React refs instead of document.getElementById.
Accessing DOM elements directly with document.getElementById can be less optimal in React applications. Utilizing React refs provides a more reliable and React-centric way to reference DOM elements, ensuring consistency with the virtual DOM.
Here's how you might refactor the code:
-
Create refs for each section:
+ const sectionRefs = sections.reduce((acc, section) => { + acc[section.id] = React.createRef(); + return acc; + }, {}); // ... {sections.map((section) => ( - <Section key={section.id} {...section} /> + <Section key={section.id} ref={sectionRefs[section.id]} {...section} /> ))}
-
Update the
handleScrollfunction to use refs:const sectionElements = sections - .map((section) => document.getElementById(section.id)) + .map((section) => sectionRefs[section.id].current) .filter((element) => element !== null);
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const handleScroll = () => { | ||
| if (!sections || sections.length === 0) return; | ||
|
|
||
| const sectionElements = sections | ||
| .map((section) => document.getElementById(section.id)) | ||
| .filter((element) => element !== null); // Filter out null elements | ||
|
|
||
| if (sectionElements.length === 0) return; | ||
|
|
||
| const currentSection = sectionElements.find((element) => { | ||
| const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect(); | ||
| return rect.top <= 100 && rect.bottom > 100; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (currentSection && currentSection.id !== activeSection) { | ||
| setActiveSection(currentSection.id); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| window.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
|
|
||
| // Clean up event listener on component unmount | ||
| return () => { | ||
| window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll); | ||
| }; | ||
| }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refine the dependencies in the useEffect hook.
Including sections and setActiveSection in the dependency array can lead to unnecessary re-renders since they don't change across renders. Also, since activeSection is being updated within the effect, it might cause an unintended loop. It's advisable to exclude these from the dependency array.
You can adjust the dependency array as follows:
- }, [sections, activeSection, setActiveSection]);
+ }, []);Additionally, if activeSection needs to be included due to linting rules or specific requirements, ensure that the handleScroll function is defined outside of the useEffect hook to prevent re-creation on every render.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
website/frontend/src/components/LoctionTracker/LocationTracker.js (2)
51-54: Provide users with an option to retry location accessIf the user denies location permission once, the application doesn't attempt to request it again. Consider adding a mechanism to allow users to grant permission if they change their mind, enhancing the user experience.
You might implement a prompt or a button that lets users retry enabling location services, and adjust the checks accordingly.
Also applies to: 61-63
10-10: Ensure consistency in storage usageYou're using both
sessionStorageandlocalStorageto store thecountry. If this is intentional, it would be helpful to document the reasons. If not, consider using one to maintain consistency and avoid potential discrepancies.Review the necessity of storing
countryin both places and choose the one that best fits your application's needs.
| import { useDispatch } from 'react-redux'; | ||
| import { setCurrentAirQloudData } from 'reduxStore/AirQlouds'; | ||
|
|
||
| const API_KEY = process.env.REACT_APP_OPENCAGE_API_KEY; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle missing API key to prevent runtime errors
If REACT_APP_OPENCAGE_API_KEY is not set, API_KEY will be undefined, leading to a failed request to the geocoding API. It's a good idea to check if API_KEY is defined before making the API call and handle the scenario gracefully.
Apply this change to add the API key check:
+ if (!API_KEY) {
+ console.error('API key is missing.');
+ return;
+ }Also applies to: 21-22
| if (!localStorage.getItem('country')) { | ||
| getUserLocation(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| dispatch(setCurrentAirQloudData(country)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider consolidating dispatch calls for clarity
In the initial useEffect, you're dispatching setCurrentAirQloudData(country) when the country is already stored in localStorage. Since you have another useEffect that listens to changes in country, you might not need this dispatch here. This could simplify the logic and make it more maintainable.
Here's how you can adjust the code:
if (!localStorage.getItem('country')) {
getUserLocation();
- } else {
- dispatch(setCurrentAirQloudData(country));
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!localStorage.getItem('country')) { | |
| getUserLocation(); | |
| } else { | |
| dispatch(setCurrentAirQloudData(country)); | |
| } | |
| if (!localStorage.getItem('country')) { | |
| getUserLocation(); | |
| } |
| setCountry(selectedCountry); | ||
| sessionStorage.setItem('country', selectedCountry); | ||
| localStorage.setItem('country', selectedCountry); | ||
| dispatch(setCurrentAirQloudData(selectedCountry)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid redundant dispatch calls to optimize performance
You're dispatching setCurrentAirQloudData(selectedCountry) inside updateUserCountry and also in the useEffect hook that watches country. This can lead to unnecessary re-renders or actions. It might be better to rely on the useEffect hook to handle updates when country changes.
Apply this diff to remove the dispatch from updateUserCountry:
- dispatch(setCurrentAirQloudData(selectedCountry));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| setCountry(selectedCountry); | |
| sessionStorage.setItem('country', selectedCountry); | |
| localStorage.setItem('country', selectedCountry); | |
| dispatch(setCurrentAirQloudData(selectedCountry)); | |
| setCountry(selectedCountry); | |
| sessionStorage.setItem('country', selectedCountry); | |
| localStorage.setItem('country', selectedCountry); |
| if (response.status !== 200) { | ||
| console.error('Failed to fetch user country, rate limit exceeded'); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplify error handling by relying on Axios's built-in mechanisms
Axios automatically throws an error for non-2xx responses, so the check for response.status !== 200 is unnecessary. You can remove this conditional block and handle all errors in the catch statement to keep the code clean and efficient.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant check:
- if (response.status !== 200) {
- console.error('Failed to fetch user country, rate limit exceeded');
- return;
- }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (response.status !== 200) { | |
| console.error('Failed to fetch user country, rate limit exceeded'); | |
| return; | |
| } |
| const isValidCountry = countries.some((country) => country.name === countryName); | ||
| const selectedCountry = isValidCountry ? countryName : DEFAULT_COUNTRY; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'countries' prop is defined before usage
There's a possibility that the countries prop might be undefined or not an array, which could lead to runtime errors when using countries.some(...). It's prudent to check if countries is an array before performing the operation.
Consider modifying the code as follows:
- const isValidCountry = countries.some((country) => country.name === countryName);
+ const isValidCountry = Array.isArray(countries) && countries.some((country) => country.name === countryName);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const isValidCountry = countries.some((country) => country.name === countryName); | |
| const selectedCountry = isValidCountry ? countryName : DEFAULT_COUNTRY; | |
| const isValidCountry = Array.isArray(countries) && countries.some((country) => country.name === countryName); | |
| const selectedCountry = isValidCountry ? countryName : DEFAULT_COUNTRY; |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
1 similar comment
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
1 similar comment
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx (2)
4-20: Well-implemented error handling logic.The state structure and lifecycle methods are correctly implemented for effective error handling. The use of
getDerivedStateFromErrorandcomponentDidCatchfollows React best practices for error boundaries.A small suggestion: Consider implementing the TODO for error logging to a service. This would greatly enhance the ability to track and resolve issues in production.
Would you like assistance in implementing error logging to a service?
27-53: Solid render logic with room for minor improvement.The render method effectively handles both error and non-error states. The conditional rendering of error details in development mode is a nice touch for debugging.
As suggested by static analysis and past comments, consider using optional chaining for a more concise and robust error display:
<p>{this.state.error?.toString()}</p> <pre>{this.state.errorInfo?.componentStack}</pre>This change ensures that
toString()andcomponentStackare only accessed if their parent objects exist, preventing potential "cannot read property of undefined" errors.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 43-43: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 44-44: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/index.js (4)
6-6: Nice catch on the naming consistency.The import statement has been updated to use 'AirQo_Payments', which aligns with the component's actual name. This improves consistency across the codebase.
Consider using camelCase for component names (e.g., 'AirQoPayments') to adhere to React naming conventions. If you decide to keep the current naming, ensure it's consistent throughout the project.
9-17: Excellent addition of an accessible TabButton component.The new TabButton component is a great improvement. It enhances accessibility with aria attributes and promotes code reusability. Well done!
Consider destructuring the props in the component's parameter list for cleaner code:
const TabButton = ({ label, isSelected, onClick }) => ( // ... rest of the component );
Line range hint
33-42: Robust URL parameter handling. Well done!The updated useEffect hook now handles URL parameters more effectively. It validates the tab from the URL, defaults to 'terms' if needed, and includes a smooth scroll to the top. These are all great improvements for user experience and code robustness.
Consider extracting the default tab ('terms') into a constant at the top of the file. This would make it easier to change the default tab in the future if needed:
const DEFAULT_TAB = 'terms'; // Then in the useEffect: setSelectedTab(tabFromUrl || DEFAULT_TAB);
53-53: Clever dynamic component selection. Great job!The new method of retrieving the selected component is more dynamic and robust. Using the optional chaining operator and providing a default component are excellent practices for handling potential edge cases.
To make this line even more concise and readable, you could use the nullish coalescing operator (??):
const SelectedComponent = tabs.find((tab) => tab.id === selectedTab)?.component ?? TermsOfService;This would eliminate the need for the logical OR (||) operator and make the fallback to TermsOfService more explicit.
website/frontend/styles/index.scss (1)
212-283: Error boundary styles are well-implemented, but could benefit from improved responsiveness.The new error boundary styles are well-structured and provide a clear visual hierarchy. The use of variables for colors promotes consistency and maintainability. The styles cover all necessary elements of the error boundary, including title, message, button, and details. Hover and focus states are properly defined for interactive elements.
However, to ensure a better user experience across all devices, consider adding media queries for smaller screen sizes. This will help maintain readability and usability on mobile devices.
Here's a suggestion to improve responsiveness:
.error-boundary { // ... existing styles ... @media (max-width: 480px) { .error-content { padding: 20px; } .error-title { font-size: 1.5rem; } .error-message { font-size: 0.875rem; } .error-button { font-size: 0.875rem; padding: 8px 16px; } } }This addition will adjust the padding, font sizes, and button dimensions for screens smaller than 480px wide, ensuring better readability and usability on mobile devices.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/AirQo_Data.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/AirQo_Payments.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/PrivacyPolicy.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/TermsOfService.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/index.js (2 hunks)
- website/frontend/styles/index.scss (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/AirQo_Data.js
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/AirQo_Payments.js
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/PrivacyPolicy.js
- website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/TermsOfService.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx
[error] 43-43: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 44-44: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
website/frontend/ErrorBoundary.jsx (2)
1-3: Solid foundation for the ErrorBoundary component.The component structure is well-suited for an error boundary. Using a class component is the correct approach, as error boundaries must be implemented as class components in React.
56-56: Correct component export.The ErrorBoundary component is properly exported as the default export, making it easy to import and use in other parts of the application.
website/frontend/src/pages/Legal/index.js (3)
23-23: Good call on flexible state initialization.Changing the initial state of
selectedTabto an empty string is a smart move. It allows for more dynamic initialization based on URL parameters, which is handled in the useEffect hook. This approach is more flexible and avoids potential inconsistencies between the initial state and the URL.
30-30: Consistent update in the tabs array. Nice work!The 'airqoPayments' tab now correctly references the 'AirQo_Payments' component, maintaining consistency with the updated import statement. Good job on ensuring that all references to the component are updated.
45-50: Smart optimization in handleTabChange. Kudos!The addition of a conditional check in the handleTabChange function is a great optimization. By preventing unnecessary state updates and navigation when the selected tab is already active, you're improving the performance of the component. This is especially valuable in larger applications where small optimizations can add up to significant performance gains.
website/frontend/styles/index.scss (4)
1-80: Imports look good.The font and component imports are well-organized and comprehensive. No changes were made to this section, which is fine.
82-103: Global styles and resets are appropriate.The global styles and resets are standard and well-implemented. They provide a good foundation for the rest of the styles.
105-137: Page layout and CTA styles are well-implemented.The page layout styles provide good structure and responsiveness. The CTA link styles are clear and include appropriate hover effects.
139-210: Miscellaneous styles and animations enhance the UI.The miscellaneous styles, including the scroll-to-top button animation and custom scrollbars, contribute to a polished user interface. These elements enhance the overall user experience.
| handleReload = () => { | ||
| // Reload the current page to recover from the error | ||
| window.location.reload(); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the error recovery process.
The handleReload method provides a straightforward way to recover from errors. However, reloading the entire page might not always be the best user experience.
Consider implementing a more granular recovery process:
- Attempt to reset the component's state that caused the error.
- If that fails, try unmounting and remounting the problematic component.
- Use page reload as a last resort.
This approach could provide a smoother user experience in many error scenarios.
Would you like me to provide a code example for this enhanced recovery process?
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Status of maturity (all need to be checked before merging):
How should this be manually tested?
What are the relevant tickets?
Screenshots (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ErrorBoundarycomponent to enhance error handling in the application, providing a fallback UI for errors.Improvements
LocationTrackercomponent's initialization and error handling for geolocation retrieval.Bug Fixes
Chores
webpack-dev-serverversion in the project dependencies for improved performance.