[Netmanager] Append user_id to deploy, recall, CRU maintenance logs activities api request body #2180
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
netmanager/.env.sample (1)
20-20: Consider providing guidance for Google Analytics setup.The Google Analytics token has been removed from the sample environment file. This change improves security by not exposing a potentially sensitive token in version control.
However, it might be helpful to add a comment explaining how users should obtain and configure their own Google Analytics token, if it's still required for the application.
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceLogs.js (1)
272-273: Approved: User ID inclusion with a minor suggestionThe addition of
user_idto the log data in the AddLogForm component is consistent with the PR objective and the changes made in the EditLog component. This ensures that user identification is included when creating new logs.For consistency with the EditLog component, consider adding a similar error check:
+if (!parsedData || !parsedData._id) { + console.error('User ID not found. User might not be logged in.'); + // Handle this case, perhaps by showing an error message to the user + return; +}This addition would provide better error handling and maintain consistency across components.
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceDeployStatus.js (3)
330-331: Approve RecallButton changes with a suggestion for user feedback.The updates to the RecallButton component are well-implemented. The addition of a recall type selection improves the specificity of the recall process, and the dropdown implementation is space-efficient. Good job!
A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a visual indicator or tooltip to inform the user that they need to select a recall type after clicking the button. This could enhance the user experience by providing clear guidance on the next required action.
You could add a tooltip to the button like this:
<Button variant="contained" color="primary" disabled={!deviceData.isActive || recallLoading} onClick={handleRecallClick} + title={selectVisible ? "Please select a recall type" : "Click to recall device"} > {recallLoading ? 'Recalling' : 'Recall Device'} </Button>Also applies to: 357-358
477-478: Approve addition of user_id with suggestion for error handling.The addition of the
user_idto thedeployDataobject is a good improvement. It allows for better tracking of who initiated the deployment. Nice work!However, there are a couple of points to consider for robustness:
- The code assumes that the user data is always present in local storage. It's good practice to handle cases where it might not be.
- There's no specific error handling if the
_idfield is not found in the parsed data.Consider adding some error checking:
const parsedData = JSON.parse(storedData); if (!parsedData || !parsedData._id) { console.error('Error: Invalid user data in local storage'); // Handle the error appropriately, maybe set a default value or show an error message return; }
530-531: Consistent addition of user_id, consider error handling.The addition of the
user_idto theresponseDataobject in thehandleRecallSubmitfunction is consistent with the changes made in the deploy function. This consistency is good for maintaining a uniform approach to user tracking across different operations.However, the same considerations apply here as in the deploy function:
- Error handling for cases where user data might not be in local storage.
- Checking for the presence of the
_idfield in the parsed data.Consider adding similar error checking as suggested for the deploy function:
const parsedData = JSON.parse(storedData); if (!parsedData || !parsedData._id) { console.error('Error: Invalid user data in local storage'); // Handle the error appropriately, maybe set a default value or show an error message return; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- netmanager/.env.sample (1 hunks)
- netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceDeployStatus.js (19 hunks)
- netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceLogs.js (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
netmanager/.env.sample (2)
21-21: Clarify the purpose of the new map preview variable.A new environment variable
REACT_APP_MAP_PREVIEWhas been added. This suggests the introduction of a new feature or configuration option related to map previews.Could you provide more context about this new variable? What does it control, and how should it be configured? Consider adding a brief comment in the file to explain its purpose and expected value format.
20-21: Verify alignment with PR objectives.The changes in this file, while potentially valuable, don't seem to directly relate to the stated PR objective of appending
user_idto certain API request bodies.Can you clarify how these environment variable changes contribute to the PR's goal of modifying API requests? If they're unrelated, consider separating these changes into a different PR to maintain focus and traceability.
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceLogs.js (4)
218-219: Approved: Improved button spacingThe addition of left margin to the "Save Changes" button enhances the visual spacing between buttons, resulting in a more polished user interface. This is a good attention to detail.
553-554: Approved: Enhanced vertical spacingThe addition of bottom margin to the button container improves the visual separation between the buttons and the content below. This small UI adjustment contributes to a more balanced and aesthetically pleasing layout.
560-561: Approved: Improved code formattingThe onClick handlers for the buttons have been moved to separate lines, enhancing code readability without altering functionality. This change aligns with best practices for maintaining clean and easily scannable code.
Also applies to: 571-572
Line range hint
1-654: Summary: PR objectives achieved with room for minor enhancementsThe changes in this file successfully implement the main objective of appending
user_idto the log data for both editing and adding logs. Additionally, some UI improvements have been made to enhance the visual appeal and readability of the code.Key points:
- User ID is now included in log data for both EditLog and AddLogForm components.
- Minor UI adjustments improve button spacing and overall layout.
- Code readability has been enhanced through better formatting.
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Implement consistent error handling for cases where user data is not available.
- Consider using a more secure method for storing and retrieving user data, if applicable to the broader application architecture.
Overall, the changes are positive and align well with the PR objectives. The suggested improvements are minor and could be addressed in this PR or as follow-up tasks.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 93-93: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceDeployStatus.js (2)
577-578: Approve style prop changes to object syntax.The updates to the
styleprop for Button components, changing from string to object syntax, are a positive improvement. This change adheres to React best practices and offers several benefits:
- It allows for easier addition of multiple style properties.
- It provides better type checking and IDE support.
- It's more consistent with how inline styles are typically handled in React.
The consistent application of this change across multiple Button components in the file is commendable. It improves code readability and maintainability.
Also applies to: 584-585, 592-593, 602-603, 610-611, 625-626, 646-647, 690-691, 719-720, 787-788, 799-800, 819-820, 842-843, 850-851
148-148: Verify the range for BatteryVoltage and consider adding units.The addition of the
BatteryVoltagefield is a good improvement for monitoring device power status. However, the current range (0 to 100) might be misleading if it's not representing a percentage. Consider the following:
- Verify if the range accurately represents all possible battery voltage values.
- Add a unit of measurement (e.g., Volts) to the label for clarity.
- If it is indeed a percentage, update the label to reflect this (e.g., "Battery Voltage Percentage").
To confirm the expected range and unit for battery voltage, you can run the following command to search for any documentation or comments related to battery voltage in the codebase:
| let currentUser = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('currentUser')); | ||
| let userId = ''; | ||
| if (currentUser) { | ||
| userId = currentUser._id; | ||
| } | ||
| const logData = { | ||
| deviceName, | ||
| locationName: deviceLocation, | ||
| date: selectedDate.toISOString(), | ||
| tags: extracted_tags, | ||
| description: description | ||
| description: description, | ||
| user_id: userId |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing user data retrieval and error handling
The addition of user_id to the log data aligns well with the PR objective. However, a few points to consider:
-
While using
localStoragefor user data is common, it's not the most secure method. Consider using a more secure state management solution or server-side sessions if possible. -
There's no error handling if the user data is not found in
localStorage. It might be beneficial to add a check and handle the case wherecurrentUseris null or undefined.
Here's a suggestion to improve error handling:
let currentUser = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('currentUser'));
-let userId = '';
-if (currentUser) {
- userId = currentUser._id;
-}
+let userId = currentUser && currentUser._id ? currentUser._id : null;
+if (!userId) {
+ console.error('User ID not found. User might not be logged in.');
+ // Handle this case, perhaps by showing an error message to the user
+}This change will provide better error handling and logging, which could be helpful for debugging and user experience.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let currentUser = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('currentUser')); | |
| let userId = ''; | |
| if (currentUser) { | |
| userId = currentUser._id; | |
| } | |
| const logData = { | |
| deviceName, | |
| locationName: deviceLocation, | |
| date: selectedDate.toISOString(), | |
| tags: extracted_tags, | |
| description: description | |
| description: description, | |
| user_id: userId | |
| let currentUser = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('currentUser')); | |
| let userId = currentUser && currentUser._id ? currentUser._id : null; | |
| if (!userId) { | |
| console.error('User ID not found. User might not be logged in.'); | |
| // Handle this case, perhaps by showing an error message to the user | |
| } | |
| const logData = { | |
| deviceName, | |
| locationName: deviceLocation, | |
| date: selectedDate.toISOString(), | |
| tags: extracted_tags, | |
| description: description, | |
| user_id: userId |
|
New netmanager changes available for preview here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceDeployStatus.js (2)
480-484: Good addition of user_id to deployDataThe inclusion of user_id in the deployData object aligns with the PR objectives. The check for the existence of parsedData._id before adding it is a good practice.
Consider adding error logging if parsedData._id is missing, as this might indicate an unexpected state:
if (parsedData._id) { deployData.user_id = parsedData._id; +} else { + console.warn('User ID is missing from parsed data'); }This will help with debugging if issues arise related to missing user IDs.
537-541: Consistent addition of user_id to responseDataThe inclusion of user_id in the responseData object for the recall functionality is consistent with the changes made in the deploy functionality and aligns with the PR objectives.
As suggested for the deploy functionality, consider adding error logging here as well:
if (parsedData._id) { responseData.user_id = parsedData._id; +} else { + console.warn('User ID is missing from parsed data for recall operation'); }This will help maintain consistency in error handling across both deploy and recall operations.
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceLogs.js (1)
Line range hint
94-107: Consider extracting user data retrieval into a helper functionI noticed that both
EditLogandAddLogFormcomponents repeat the logic for fetching user data from local storage. To make your code more maintainable and reduce redundancy, it might be a good idea to extract this logic into a shared helper function.Here's how you could do it:
// In a utilities file, e.g., userUtils.js export const getUserId = () => { const storedData = localStorage.getItem('currentUser'); if (!storedData) { console.error('Error: No user data found in local storage'); return null; } const parsedData = JSON.parse(storedData); return parsedData._id || null; };Then, in your components:
import { getUserId } from 'path/to/userUtils'; // ... const userId = getUserId(); if (userId) { logData.user_id = userId; }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 104-104: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceDeployStatus.js (19 hunks)
- netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceLogs.js (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceLogs.js
[error] 104-104: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
netmanager/src/views/components/DataDisplay/DeviceView/DeviceDeployStatus.js (3)
148-148: Nice addition of BatteryVoltage to sensorFeedNameMapper!The new entry for BatteryVoltage is consistent with the existing structure and provides a reasonable range for battery voltage monitoring.
167-168: Styling improvement for EmptyDeviceTest componentThe style changes to the Button component enhance consistency and maintain the component's functionality. Good attention to detail!
205-206: Consistent styling in DeviceRecentFeedView componentThe style adjustments in the DeviceRecentFeedView component enhance code readability and maintain consistent styling throughout the component. These changes are purely cosmetic and don't affect functionality.
Also applies to: 212-213, 236-237, 277-278
| @@ -265,6 +272,11 @@ const AddLogForm = ({ deviceName, deviceLocation, toggleShow, loading, setLoadin | |||
| lastName: parsedData.lastName | |||
| }; | |||
|
|
|||
| // Add user_id only if it exists | |||
| if (parsedData._id) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify condition with optional chaining
Similarly, you can simplify if (parsedData._id) to enhance readability:
Apply this diff:
-if (parsedData._id) {
+if (parsedData?._id) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (parsedData._id) { | |
| if (parsedData?._id) { |
| @@ -99,6 +100,11 @@ | |||
| description: description | |||
| }; | |||
|
|
|||
| // Add user_id only if it exists | |||
| if (currentUser && currentUser._id) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify condition with optional chaining
You can streamline the condition if (currentUser && currentUser._id) by using optional chaining. It makes the code cleaner and more readable.
Apply this diff:
-if (currentUser && currentUser._id) {
+if (currentUser?._id) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (currentUser && currentUser._id) { | |
| if (currentUser?._id) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 104-104: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
|
New netmanager changes available for preview here |
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Status of maturity (all need to be checked before merging):
How should this be manually tested?
What are the relevant tickets?
Screenshots (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style