Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Process streams using deterministic (alpha-sorted) ordering #335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2024

Conversation

aaronsteers
Copy link
Contributor

@aaronsteers aaronsteers commented Aug 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced stream processing functionality to ensure a consistent and deterministic order in which stream names are processed.
  • Documentation

    • Expanded docstring to clarify the new behavior and importance of stream processing order.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the write_all_stream_data function in the RecordProcessor class enhance its functionality by introducing a deterministic processing order for stream names. Previously, the order of processing was dependent on the order of streams provided by the catalog, but now it sorts them alphabetically, improving consistency and predictability in stream handling.

Changes

Files Change Summary
airbyte/_future_cdk/record_processor.py Updated write_all_stream_data function to sort stream names alphabetically, enhancing predictability. Docstring revised to reflect this change.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Catalog
    participant RecordProcessor

    Catalog->>RecordProcessor: Provide stream names
    RecordProcessor->>RecordProcessor: Sort stream names alphabetically
    RecordProcessor->>RecordProcessor: Process each stream in sorted order
    RecordProcessor->>Catalog: Write processed data
Loading

Wdyt? Would you like to add any additional details or modifications to this summary?


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23da920 and 9e9643a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • airbyte/_future_cdk/record_processor.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
airbyte/_future_cdk/record_processor.py (1)

255-259: Great update on deterministic ordering!

The change to process streams in alphabetical order enhances consistency and predictability. The updated docstring clearly communicates this behavior. Would it be beneficial to add a note about potential impacts on performance if the list of streams is very large, or is this negligible in your context? Wdyt?


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aaronsteers aaronsteers enabled auto-merge (squash) August 10, 2024 00:05
@aaronsteers aaronsteers merged commit 9bb782e into main Aug 10, 2024
16 checks passed
@aaronsteers aaronsteers deleted the feat/process-cache-streams-as-sorted branch August 10, 2024 00:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant