Make variables names _∙∙_∙∙_ consistent with those in doubleComp-faces and remove an unnecessary space #1029
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Maintainers, I am new to Cubical Agda. The variable name order of "x", "y", "z", and "w" is different in the functions _∙∙_∙∙_ and doubleComp-faces which the former depends on, thus "p" and "r" in 2 functions have different types in reading. This confuses beginners like me when I learn their implementations for the first time.
I also notice that throughout the library the order of such plain letter variables is different in different functions. Maybe a rule/guideline of a canonical order can be enforced to reduce these confusions. Or ignore me if it's just a trivial beginner problem.