Skip to content

exotel-py 0.1.6 includes code execution backdoor inserted by a third party

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 28, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Nov 21, 2024

Package

pip exotel (pip)

Affected versions

= 0.1.6

Patched versions

None

Description

The exotel (aka exotel-py) package in PyPI as of 0.1.6 includes a code execution backdoor inserted by a third party. Users should downgrade to version 0.1.5 to avoid the problem.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 27, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 28, 2022
Reviewed Sep 20, 2022
Last updated Nov 21, 2024

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

0.417%
(75th percentile)

Weaknesses

No CWEs

CVE ID

CVE-2022-38792

GHSA ID

GHSA-cv6j-9835-p7fh

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.