Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 🐛 remove ability to specify backup capital cost fee #875

Merged

Conversation

james-a-morris
Copy link
Contributor

We shouldn't be allowed to set a backup default cost config fee. This is indicative of a misconfured capital cost setting. We should have an intentional default for a given token or else we should fail.

A failure condition has been added to across-protocol/sdk#430 and we will need to bump the SDK before we merge this change.

We shouldn't be allowed to set a backup default cost config fee. This is indicative of a misconfured capital cost setting. We should have an intentional default for a given token or else we should fail.
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Oct 16, 2023

ACX-1618 Remove default flat cost config fee

The Default Flat Capital Cost Config fee is strictly meant to provide a fallback if the capital cost config doesn't contain all necessary tokens.

Let's remove that and enforce a start-up error.

@james-a-morris james-a-morris requested review from mrice32 and nicholaspai and removed request for mrice32 October 16, 2023 21:55
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 16, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
frontend-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 17, 2023 6:44pm
goerli-frontend-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 17, 2023 6:44pm

Copy link
Contributor

@dohaki dohaki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@james-a-morris james-a-morris merged commit ef8223d into master Oct 17, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants