Prevent instance name conflicts with search and pulldata #695
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lognaturel
force-pushed
the
search_pulldata
branch
from
d8cd150 to
b3e0972
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #694
Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?
It's easy to follow and brings back some logic that existed previously. I think pulling the regex into a function in utils makes usage easier to understand.
What are the regression risks?
This is a response to an unexpected regression. It feels very low-risk to me. Any possible risk is limited to the
search()functionality.Does this change require updates to documentation? If so, please file an issue here and include the link below.
No.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:
testsnosetestsand verified all tests passblack pyxform teststo format code