Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add building of toolchains targetting windows-x64 and linux-aarch64 #36

Closed
ZacWalk opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #40
Closed

Add building of toolchains targetting windows-x64 and linux-aarch64 #36

ZacWalk opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #40
Assignees
Labels
mvp Issue is important for basic functionality

Comments

@ZacWalk
Copy link
Member

ZacWalk commented Nov 3, 2023

We need to make sure we are not causing regressions in those closely related toolchains targetting windows-x64 and linux-aarch64.

Let's add these targets to the advanced build script and actions matrix.

We want this as a simple stop-gap until we upstream and can take advantage of Linaro's CI.

@ZacWalk ZacWalk added the mvp Issue is important for basic functionality label Nov 3, 2023
@taozuhong
Copy link

Building windows-x64 and linux-aarch64 on the ARM platform? or x64 platform?

@Blackhex
Copy link
Member

Blackhex commented Nov 13, 2023

@taozuhong So far we are building the toolchain on the default x86 linux GHA runners only as Arm64-ones are not generally available and this ticket should just add the Linux x86 and Windows x86 toolchain targets build variants. Purpose of this workflow is just to detect possible regressions caused by our own changes or by rebasing to the upstream. Please, note that there was a significant portion of work done on providing this toolchain also for MSYS2 environment as worklfow in this repo demonstrates,

@ZacWalk The "windows-x64" part of this ticket is implemented by #40

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mvp Issue is important for basic functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants