-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Zilch added a message #3000
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Zilch added a message #3000
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update to the README.md file introduces a new line suggesting a prompt for further modifications. This addition implies a potential call to action or an invitation for contributors to consider making additional changes. There are no alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities in this update. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ty Classroom initiative really great! - Lets see if we can make any changes to this ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)
[style] ~8-~8: In contexts where ‘if’ is followed by ‘or’, using ‘whether’ may be more appropriate (and formal).
Context: ...oom initiative really great! - Lets see if we can make any changes to this or not!...(IF_WHETHER)
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ | |||
- I love MLH | |||
- More power to kunal. love the work which your are doing for the community. | |||
- Anirudh Sharma finds the Community Classroom initiative really great! | |||
- Lets see if we can make any changes to this or not! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Grammar and Style Improvement Needed
The added line could be improved for grammatical correctness and style:
- Consider adding an apostrophe to "Lets" to form the correct contraction for "Let us".
- The phrase "if we can make any changes to this or not" could be more formally expressed as "whether we can make any changes to this."
- Lets see if we can make any changes to this or not!
+ Let's see whether we can make any changes to this or not!
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
- Lets see if we can make any changes to this or not! | |
- Let's see whether we can make any changes to this or not! |
Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ty Classroom initiative really great! - Lets see if we can make any changes to this ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)
[style] ~8-~8: In contexts where ‘if’ is followed by ‘or’, using ‘whether’ may be more appropriate (and formal).
Context: ...oom initiative really great! - Lets see if we can make any changes to this or not!...(IF_WHETHER)
Summary by CodeRabbit