Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev 1.9.0 webank pom #638

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

Dev 1.9.0 webank pom #638

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

taoran1250
Copy link
Collaborator

What is the purpose of the change

EngineConn-Core defines the the abstractions and interfaces of the EngineConn core functions.
The Engine Service in Linkis 0.x is refactored, EngineConn will handle the engine connection
and session management.

Related issues/PRs

Related issues: close #590 close #591
Related pr:#591

Brief change log

  • Define the core abstraction and interfaces of the EngineConn Factory;
  • Define the core abstraction and interfaces of Executor Manager.

Checklist

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines on pull requests.
  • I have explained the need for this PR and the problem it solves
  • I have explained the changes or the new features added to this PR
  • I have added tests corresponding to this change
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect this change
  • I have verified that this change is backward compatible (If not, please discuss on the Linkis mailing list first)
  • If this is a code change: I have written unit tests to fully verify the new behavior.

@taoran1250 taoran1250 changed the title Dev 1.9.0 webank pom [WIP]Dev 1.9.0 webank pom Nov 5, 2024
@taoran1250 taoran1250 changed the title [WIP]Dev 1.9.0 webank pom Dev 1.9.0 webank pom Nov 5, 2024
Copy link

@casionone casionone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@casionone casionone merged commit 022446e into dev-1.9.0-webank Nov 5, 2024
8 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants