Add flow-less summary storage #235
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR proposes to add a summary storage without Flow's, which allows for deterministic (non-asynchronous!) subscriptions on summary edges.
Ultimately, this enables us to use
MethodUnitResolverwithout any doubts, which currently is not very possible to due the fact that method-bound runners might die (i.e. might be killed by the manager) due to their queue exhaustion before the subscription on summary edges will be handled by the separate spawned coroutine (launch+SharedFlow::collect).Moved from UnitTestBot/jacodb#222.