Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: A constructive Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein theorem? #1206

Draft
wants to merge 76 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I see that we usually phrase small decidable predicates in terms of functions into Fin 2, such as for the omniscience principles. However, I'd like to instead use bool because I'd like to introduce is-true := Eq-bool true and is-false := Eq-bool false predicates, and find the fact that one has to pattern match on the elements of Fin 2 twice a bit hassling. Is it okay if I continue using bool over Fin 2 in my developments in logic @EgbertRijke?

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
# Directed complete posets
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible to move existing files in a separate pull request that only moves files, like I did in #1223 to preserve your authorship of some files about globular types?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! I'll see about how to solve this

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you mind answering my question above in the PR, btw?

@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Some of the work I need to do to continue this PR depends on #1188. Could we merge that PR soon?

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2024
@EgbertRijke
Copy link
Collaborator

Some of the work I need to do to continue this PR depends on #1188. Could we merge that PR soon?

Thanks for the heads up! I'll make it a priority.

@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Turns out the approach I had in mind for this PR doesn't quite work and needs to be rethought a little. Since this PR still covers some additions not covered by other PRs I'll leave it open, but ultimately this PR should be closed until a correct approach is found.

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants