Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency ts-jest to v29.1.5 - autoclosed #654

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 9, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ts-jest (source) 29.1.2 -> 29.1.5 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

kulshekhar/ts-jest (ts-jest)

v29.1.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v29.1.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Features

v29.1.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • add @jest/transform as an optional peer dependency (0ba7f86)
  • bring back Node 14 support (eda56a7)
Performance Improvements
  • remove ts resolved module cache file (4c88da5)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.1.x branch 5 times, most recently from 7ee8171 to 2f5e07b Compare January 6, 2025 13:31
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.1.x branch from 2f5e07b to 99f5ec6 Compare January 6, 2025 13:32
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency ts-jest to v29.1.5 Update dependency ts-jest to v29.1.5 - autoclosed Jan 6, 2025
@renovate renovate bot closed this Jan 6, 2025
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/ts-jest-29.1.x branch January 6, 2025 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants