-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: sensor support integration #141
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I'm getting the unsupported properties warning when using custom colliders with intersection events: [Vue warn]: Extraneous non-emits event listeners (intersectionEnter, intersectionExit) were passed to component but could not be automatically inherited because component renders fragment or text root nodes. If the listener is intended to be a component custom event listener only, declare it using the "emits" option.
at <Anonymous name="cuboid-sensor" args= Array(3) position= Array(3) ... >
at <RigidBody type="fixed" >
at <Physics debug="" >
at <App> I understand this is coming from my export const emitIntersection = (
source: sourceTarget,
target: sourceTarget,
started: boolean,
) => {
const collisionType: collisionType = started ? 'enter' : 'exit'
const colliderNode = (source.object as any)?.__vnode?.children?.[1]?.children?.find((child: any) => child?.component?.exposed?.instance?.value === source.context.collider)
colliderNode?.component?.emit?.(`intersection-${collisionType}`, { source, target })
} I don't have a better solution right now to solve the issue, but I'll try to dig in to see if I can improve the integration.
|
Hi @Neosoulink this is probably happening because those new Is it |
Hi @alvarosabu,
|
Hi @Neosoulink if you are in control of the Collider Component, I think you need define the emits using |
Okay, let me try this ✅ |
@Neosoulink in order to use the same "system" that I use, you should emit the events in the parent, the RigidBody which is a 3DGroup... I know it is just a draft (of end documentation) But if you check here: The solution I came was to emit the event in the parent. The BaseCollider is not a Tres component and doesn't have the same vNode properties (in fact is just a You can check here how I handle it: https://github.com/Tresjs/rapier/blob/main/src/utils/collisions.ts#L8 Except that, this is a nice work, thank you. PS: Don't forget to submit the documentation, is missing. |
@JaimeTorrealba I see now, and it's also joining the @alvarosabu note... In that case, we have to define emits directly in the project, |
Hi @alvarosabu @JaimeTorrealba, I just pushed the fix for the properties warning issue. But I'm not sure if I should add documentation in this PR as well, I mean this PR will get bigger Otherwise, this PR is ready for review |
@@ -86,5 +98,7 @@ onUnmounted(() => { | |||
</script> | |||
|
|||
<template> | |||
<slot></slot> | |||
<TresGroup> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason to use a <TresGroup>
here is what @JaimeTorrealba mentioned here #141 (comment) ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, exactly!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking about this, a <TresGroup />
makes no sense here... Maybe add a "dummy" object like a "TresObject3D".
Something that can emit an event (a Tres-vue component) but also something that makes sense when you inspect the hierarchy tree in Three.js.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes @JaimeTorrealba, I used a Group
to match what was done in the RigidBody
component,
But in reality, both of them should use Object3D
instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, I mean, we use TresGroup a lot on cientos for some of the abstractions, so I'm fine either way.
@JaimeTorrealba what does the dummy object would look like?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My suggestion is exactly that a "TresObject3D" (we generally used a dummy object3D in instanceMesh) it would solve the issue, also we can add (optionally) some :name="ColliderId"
attribute, this way if you look into the threeJs scene makes more sense than a plain TresGroup, right? Or any other data/value that identify as a collider. All these are just suggestions., @alvarosabu.
@Neosoulink IDK if I misunderstand your last comment, but no <RigidBody>
receive slots, it makes sense to be a TresGroup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, there's no misunderstanding,
I was just clarifying the topic of using an Object3D
.
Regarding
It's expected to have documentation in the same scope as the PR whenever there is a new feature or bugfix. It's also a way reviewers can understand the code changes quicker as they were a new user. |
Got it |
### Description - Add new `vNode` extended types - `TresVNodeObject` - `TresVNode` - Add a `TresObject` to collider
5629170
to
1b37050
Compare
I added a minimal senor documentation |
src/components/Physics.vue
Outdated
started, | ||
) | ||
|
||
if (started) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A small improvement here.
I know this is the approach of R3F but if you pay attention to my collisionEmisor
I handle the state (started true or false) in the function itself, this way we don't have to put an extra if in Physic and also don't have to repeat the emitIntersection
function. Also keep consistency in the code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but it was also my design choice to be able to trigger the starting and the ending.
But yeah, let me correct this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made the change @JaimeTorrealba
7b6409c
to
20463a7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can improve this in the future in order to accept automatic colliders too.
But the implementation is stable, thanks for this one
I spend time looking for a good way to implement it. Let's say you have your RigidBody and add the sensor property. Will the sensor events (Enter & Exit) be triggered when a collider transverses any collider inside that RigidBody? |
### Description - Add `Sensor` to `RigidBody` component props - `RigidBodyProps` inherits types from `ColliderProps`
cea5780
to
ae1ec30
Compare
ae1ec30
to
44de932
Compare
Hey @alvarosabu @JaimeTorrealba, you can take a look at the description of this PR, I added documentation on how to use the sensor |
docs/components/collider.md
Outdated
- **@intersection-enter**: When another collider starts to traverse the *sensor* | ||
- **@intersection-exit**: When another collider leave the *sensor* | ||
|
||
> ℹ️ Note that you can directly pass those properties to the **`RigidBody`** for **auto-colliders**. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Neosoulink You can use an info block here for this note. Similar to the one below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure thing!
4403212
to
09a95bc
Compare
Summary
This PR comes with the
sensor
intersection support!Enable users to use custom colliders as sensors:
Logs
bounding-box
availabilityvNode
extended typesTresVNodeObject
TresVNode
resObject
to collider componentssesnor
demoRecord
Screen.Recording.2024-11-10.at.12.40.45.AM.mov
Documentation addition
Sensor
The Sensor feature allows events to be triggered when there's an intersection or in other words, when the collider is traversed by another collider.
The traversed
Collider
(or the collider that will trigger events), is the sensor and should set theactiveCollision
andsensor
properties totrue
.By passing the above properties, the collider will no longer be affected by the physics law and will now start triggering the following intersection events: