Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @types/jest to v29.5.12 - autoclosed #49

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

tradeshift-renovate[bot]
Copy link

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@types/jest (source) devDependencies patch 29.5.11 -> 29.5.12

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@tradeshift-renovate tradeshift-renovate bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file dev labels Feb 1, 2024
wejendorp and others added 3 commits February 4, 2024 00:18
This PR changes the ownership of this repo to SRE, as the developer productivity team doesn't exist anymore.
@tradeshift-renovate tradeshift-renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from 5efcc9f to 17b6b9f Compare February 4, 2024 00:21
@tradeshift-renovate tradeshift-renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency @types/jest to v29.5.12 chore(deps): update dependency @types/jest to v29.5.12 - autoclosed Feb 11, 2024
@tradeshift-renovate tradeshift-renovate bot deleted the renovate/jest-monorepo branch February 11, 2024 00:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file dev
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants