Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: more flexible dependencies version! #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

amindadgar
Copy link
Member

@amindadgar amindadgar commented Dec 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated package version to 2.0.4.
  • Chores

    • Modified dependency versions in requirements.txt for greater flexibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the requirements.txt and setup.py files. In requirements.txt, specific version constraints for several dependencies have been modified to allow for a range of acceptable versions, enhancing flexibility in dependency management. In setup.py, the package version has been incremented from "2.0.3" to "2.0.4" without any other changes to the file's structure or functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
requirements.txt Updated version constraints for numpy, pytest, pytest-cov, coverage, python-dotenv, neo4j, and graphdatascience to allow ranges instead of exact versions.
setup.py Incremented package version from "2.0.3" to "2.0.4".

Possibly related PRs

  • Update requirements.txt #10: This PR also modifies the requirements.txt file, but it changes the version specifications from >= to ==, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding dependency version management.

Poem

In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
New versions await, as fresh as can be.
With ranges now set, our dependencies play,
A dance of updates, come what may!
From "two point three" to "four" we ascend,
Hooray for the changes, let the fun never end! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46fd05a and dbda719.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • setup.py
  • requirements.txt

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@amindadgar amindadgar merged commit 766aa11 into main Dec 11, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant