Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable adding role for community creator #164

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

Behzad-rabiei
Copy link
Member

@Behzad-rabiei Behzad-rabiei commented Apr 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the structure of the options object in platform model tests.
  • Chores
    • Updated application version to 3.0.51.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Temporarily disabled role additions during platform save operations to enhance stability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve adjustments to testing configurations and schema management for a platform model, alongside a minor version bump in the project. Specifically, the test suite saw a reorganization of options within an array, and a schema update includes the temporary removal of a feature related to role assignments during platform saves.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../models/platform.model.test.ts Restructured options in tests; commented out role assertions.
package.json Updated version from "3.0.50" to "3.0.51".
src/.../Platform.schema.ts Commented out code block for adding roles on save.

Poem

🐇✨
A tiny hop in version, a leap in code,
From tests to schemas, a lighter load.
No more roles in a swift command,
Just a rabbit hopping through the land.
Celebrate the changes, fresh and new,
A version bump, from .50 to .51 too!
🌟📜


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1bb36d and fa7a3b0.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/unit/models/platform.model.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/models/schemas/Platform.schema.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • package.json
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/models/schemas/Platform.schema.ts (1)

98-110: Commented out role addition logic in post-save hook.

Ensure that this change is thoroughly tested, especially in scenarios where roles might still be expected to be added by other parts of the application.

Verification successful

The verification process has confirmed that the role addition logic was successfully removed from the Platform.schema.ts file, and no other parts of the application are adding roles using this logic. The only other reference to roles in this context is related to modifying existing roles in the Community collection, which is not affected by the removal of the role addition logic.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the role addition logic in the codebase.
rg --type ts "roles: {"

Length of output: 105



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Corrected search for any remaining references to the role addition logic in the codebase.
rg --type ts "roles: \{"

Length of output: 238

__tests__/unit/models/platform.model.test.ts (1)

91-102: Commented out assertions related to communityDoc.roles.

This change should be verified to ensure that no unintended side effects occur due to the removal of these assertions.

Verification successful

Based on the script output, the only reference to communityDoc.roles within TypeScript files is within the commented-out assertions themselves. This indicates that no other tests are currently expecting roles to be present in community documents, which minimizes the risk of unintended side effects from the removal of these assertions.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining tests that might still expect roles to be present in community documents.
rg --type ts "communityDoc.roles"

Length of output: 159


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Comment on lines +48 to +54
// options: {
// platforms: [
// { platform: new Types.ObjectId() },
// { platform: platform._id },
// { platform: new Types.ObjectId() },
// ],
// },
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The search results indicate that the old options structure is still being referenced in commented-out code within both the platform.model.test.ts and community.model.test.ts files. This suggests that the restructuring of the options object might not be fully reflected across all relevant tests.

Actionable Directive

Review and update the test cases in platform.model.test.ts and community.model.test.ts to ensure they align with the new structure of the options object. This is crucial to maintain consistency and accuracy in your test suite.

Analysis chain

Commented out test cases related to platform options in the module.

Ensure that the restructuring of the options object is correctly reflected in other tests that might interact with this structure.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any tests that might still be using the old `options` structure.
rg --type ts "options: { platforms:"

Length of output: 153



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Correcting the regex error and re-running the search for any tests that might still be using the old `options` structure.
rg --type ts "options: \{ platforms:"

Length of output: 299

@cyri113 cyri113 merged commit 7302939 into main Apr 15, 2024
11 checks passed
@Behzad-rabiei Behzad-rabiei deleted the disable-adding-role-for-community-creator branch September 6, 2024 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants