Feat/UI improvements #72
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the user interface and responsiveness of the application. Key changes involve the removal of an SVG icon link and updating the document title in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying identity-on-chain-platform with
|
| Latest commit: |
75ceb64
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://d61b12f5.identity-on-chain-platform.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feat-ui-improvements.identity-on-chain-platform.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/components/layouts/MobileScreensContainer.tsx (1)
18-18: Consider zIndex conflictsUsing a very high zIndex (9999) might cause issues with other overlays or modals. Consider using a theme-based zIndex system.
- zIndex: 9999, + zIndex: theme.zIndex.modal + 1,src/index.css (1)
49-51: Remove redundant CSS reset propertiesThese reset properties are already handled by Tailwind's base styles (
@tailwind base). Having them here creates unnecessary duplication.Consider removing these lines as they're redundant with Tailwind's reset.
src/main.tsx (2)
37-40: Add error boundary and type safety improvementsConsider the following improvements:
- Wrap the app with an error boundary
- Add proper type assertion for the theme prop
+import { ErrorBoundary } from './components/ErrorBoundary'; +import { Theme } from '@mui/material/styles'; - <ThemeProvider theme={theme}> + <ErrorBoundary> + <ThemeProvider theme={theme as Theme}> <CssBaseline /> <App /> </ThemeProvider> + </ErrorBoundary>
13-13: Use more specific import path for themeConsider using a more specific import path to avoid potential naming conflicts.
-import theme from './libs/theme'; +import theme from './libs/theme/materialTheme';src/App.tsx (1)
39-48: Consider progressive enhancement for mobile usersWhile showing a mobile warning screen is valid, completely blocking mobile access might be too restrictive. Consider:
- Identifying which features work on mobile
- Implementing a responsive design for basic features
- Only blocking complex features on mobile
src/components/layouts/SidebarApp.tsx (1)
55-83: Consider extracting complex stylesThe current implementation has complex inline styles that could be:
- Extracted into a separate styles object
- Simplified using theme mixins
- Reused across similar components
Example refactor:
const useStyles = (theme) => ({ listButton: { display: 'flex', justifyContent: 'center', gap: 1, mt: 1, padding: '8px 16px', borderRadius: 2, }, listButtonSelected: { backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.main, color: theme.palette.primary.contrastText, '&:hover': { backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.main, }, }, // ... other styles });src/components/shared/CustomTable.tsx (1)
89-91: LGTM! Consider adding aria-label for better accessibility.The layout changes improve visual consistency by aligning items horizontally with proper spacing. The capitalization of application names enhances readability.
Consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility:
- <div className="flex flex-row items-center justify-center text-center mx-auto space-x-3"> + <div className="flex flex-row items-center justify-center text-center mx-auto space-x-3" aria-label={`${applicationName} application`}>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
index.html(1 hunks)src/App.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/layouts/MobileScreensContainer.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/layouts/SidebarApp.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/shared/CustomTable.tsx(2 hunks)src/index.css(1 hunks)src/main.tsx(2 hunks)src/pages/Auth/Login/Login.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx(2 hunks)src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- index.html
- src/pages/Auth/Login/Login.tsx
- src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (2)
16-16: LGTM! More user-friendly step label
Changing "Transact" to "Complete" makes the step more intuitive for users who may not be familiar with blockchain terminology.
56-57: LGTM! Clearer alert message
The revised message is more concise while maintaining clarity about the attestation process.
src/App.tsx (2)
65-93: LGTM! Well-structured routing implementation
The route structure effectively:
- Handles authentication flow
- Protects routes appropriately
- Provides clear navigation paths
56-64: Verify chain configuration security
The chain configuration needs careful consideration:
- The fallback to
baseSepoliais appropriate - However, we should verify chain switching behavior
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification of the chain configuration security. Let me generate the final response:
Chain configuration implementation is secure and well-structured
The codebase shows a robust chain configuration setup:
- Proper fallback to
baseSepoliawhenchainIdis null - Chain-specific configurations are properly mapped in multiple contexts (EAS endpoints, contracts)
- Chain ID validation is implemented across components
- Proper error handling for undefined chain IDs in session management
Key security aspects verified:
- Chain-specific contract addresses are predefined and not dynamically constructed
- GraphQL endpoints are properly mapped to specific chain IDs
- Chain ID verification is performed before critical operations
- Session signatures require valid chain IDs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for chain-related security checks
rg -A 3 "chainId|chain.*switch"
Length of output: 14327
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/layouts/SidebarApp.spec.tsx (1)
Line range hint
26-45: Consider enhancing test coverage.While the current test coverage is good, consider adding these test cases for completeness:
- Responsive behavior testing
- Snapshot tests for UI consistency
- Edge cases like long menu titles
Example addition:
it('should maintain layout on different screen sizes', () => { // Set viewport to mobile size window.innerWidth = 375; window.dispatchEvent(new Event('resize')); render( <BrowserRouter> <SidebarApp /> </BrowserRouter> ); // Add assertions for mobile layout expect(screen.getByTestId('drawer_app')).toHaveStyle({ width: expect.any(String) }); }); it('matches snapshot', () => { const { container } = render( <BrowserRouter> <SidebarApp /> </BrowserRouter> ); expect(container).toMatchSnapshot(); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/layouts/SidebarApp.spec.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/layouts/SidebarApp.spec.tsx (1)
37-37: LGTM! Logo text update aligns with rebranding.
The test correctly verifies the new branding from 'LOGO' to 'LogID'.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
MobileScreensContainercomponent for users on mobile devices, informing them the app is not optimized for mobile.Enhancements
Bug Fixes