Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Added default message for no data source! #111

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

amindadgar
Copy link
Member

@amindadgar amindadgar commented Dec 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new constant to provide users with a message when no relevant information is available, guiding them to contact the community manager for assistance.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling in the query function to return a specific response when no source nodes are available.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the query_multiple_source function in subquery.py to improve error handling when no source nodes are available. A new constant NO_ANSWER_REFERENCE is added to utils/globals.py, which provides a standardized response for scenarios where no relevant information can be found. The change enhances the function's ability to gracefully handle cases with no available sources by returning a specific reference message.

Changes

File Change Summary
subquery.py Added import of NO_ANSWER_REFERENCE from utils.globals; Modified return logic to handle empty source_nodes by returning NO_ANSWER_REFERENCE
utils/globals.py Added new constant NO_ANSWER_REFERENCE with a message for cases of no available documentation or community information

Poem

🐰 When sources run dry and answers hide,
A rabbit's wisdom shall now provide
A gentle nudge, a helpful sign
No data? Fear not, we'll realign!
With NO_ANSWER_REFERENCE so bright,
Guiding seekers through the coding night 🔍

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
utils/globals.py (1)

8-11: LGTM! Consider minor message refinement

The constant is well-named and provides a user-friendly message. However, consider making the message slightly more specific.

Consider this minor refinement:

-    "Current documentation and community chats draw a blank. "
+    "No relevant information found in the current documentation or community chats. "
subquery.py (1)

231-234: Simplify the conditional return statement

The nested if-else structure can be simplified while maintaining the same logic.

-    if source_nodes == []:
-        return NO_ANSWER_REFERENCE, source_nodes
-    else:
-        return response.response, source_nodes
+    return (NO_ANSWER_REFERENCE if source_nodes == [] else response.response), source_nodes
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cda40e9 and d06d194.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • subquery.py (2 hunks)
  • utils/globals.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
subquery.py (2)

10-10: LGTM! Import is properly organized

The new constant import is correctly placed with related imports from utils.globals.


Line range hint 27-67: Update docstring to reflect new behavior

The function's docstring should be updated to document the new behavior when no sources are available.

Add to the Returns section:

     Returns
     --------
     response : str,
         the response to the user query from the LLM
-        using the engines of the given platforms (platform equal to True)
+        using the engines of the given platforms (platform equal to True).
+        Returns a default message if no relevant sources are found.
     source_nodes : list[NodeWithScore]
         the list of nodes that were source of answering

Let's verify the callers handle both cases appropriately:

✅ Verification successful

Docstring update needed, but error handling is appropriate

The docstring should be updated as suggested to document the default message behavior when no sources are found. The caller in worker/tasks.py simply passes through the response and references without additional processing, which is appropriate since:

  1. The function returns a tuple of (response, references) in both success and no-data cases
  2. The caller doesn't need special handling as the function already provides a valid response message in all cases
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for function calls to verify error handling
rg -A 5 "query_multiple_source\(" --type py

Length of output: 501


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation in worker/tasks.py to see how it handles the response
rg -B 5 -A 10 "query_multiple_source\(" worker/tasks.py

Length of output: 474


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any error handling patterns in worker/tasks.py
rg -B 10 -A 10 "def query_data_sources" worker/tasks.py

Length of output: 514

@amindadgar amindadgar merged commit 2901345 into main Dec 17, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant