feat: lowering references threshold to 0.5! #104
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the instantiation of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
routers/amqp.py (1)
Line range hint
7-7: Consider adding configuration management for the threshold valueWhile the threshold change is consistently implemented, consider making it configurable through environment variables or a configuration file. This would:
- Allow easy adjustment without code changes
- Support different thresholds for different environments (dev/staging/prod)
- Enable A/B testing of different threshold values
Example implementation:
from utils.config import get_config class PrepareAnswerSources: def __init__(self, threshold: float = None) -> None: self.threshold = threshold or get_config('REFERENCE_THRESHOLD', default=0.5)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
routers/amqp.py(1 hunks)utils/query_engine/prepare_answer_sources.py(1 hunks)worker/tasks.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
worker/tasks.py (1)
22-23: LGTM: Consistent with the new default threshold
The removal of the explicit threshold parameter is aligned with the updated default value in PrepareAnswerSources.
| @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| class PrepareAnswerSources: | |||
| def __init__(self, threshold: float = 0.7) -> None: | |||
| def __init__(self, threshold: float = 0.5) -> None: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Lowering the threshold requires test updates and monitoring
The implementation shows that the threshold is used to filter URLs based on node scores, and the test suite still uses the old threshold (0.7). This change needs attention in two areas:
- The test suite in
tests/unit/test_prepare_answer_sources.pyneeds to be updated to use the new default threshold of 0.5 or explicitly test both thresholds - The logging statement indicates this is a critical filter - lowering it could lead to more URLs being included, requiring monitoring in production
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider the implications of lowering the similarity threshold
Lowering the threshold from 0.7 to 0.5 will result in more reference nodes being included in the output. While this increases recall, it might:
- Include less relevant references (more false positives)
- Generate longer responses with more references
- Potentially impact memory usage when processing more nodes
Let's analyze the impact:
Let me gather more information about how the threshold is actually used in the code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files and test cases related to threshold validation
fd -e py -e yaml -e json test_ | xargs rg -A 5 "threshold.*0.[57]|PrepareAnswerSources"
# Look for any performance benchmarks or memory profiling
fd -e py benchmark | xargs rg -A 5 "PrepareAnswerSources"
Length of output: 3609
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how the threshold is used in the implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def prepare_answer_sources($$$) { $$$ }' utils/query_engine/prepare_answer_sources.py
# Look for any filtering logic using the threshold
rg -A 10 "threshold" utils/query_engine/prepare_answer_sources.py
Length of output: 1331
| @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ async def ask(payload: Payload, logger: Logger): | |||
| response, references = query_data_sources( | |||
| community_id=community_id, query=question | |||
| ) | |||
| prepare_answer = PrepareAnswerSources(threshold=0.7) | |||
| prepare_answer = PrepareAnswerSources() | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update test case to use new default threshold value
The verification found that test_prepare_answer_sources.py still uses the old threshold value of 0.7. This test case needs to be updated to match the new default value of 0.5.
tests/unit/test_prepare_answer_sources.py: UpdatePrepareAnswerSources(threshold=0.7)to either remove the explicit threshold parameter or set it to 0.5
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Consistent with the new default threshold
The removal of the explicit threshold parameter is aligned with the updated default value in PrepareAnswerSources.
Let's verify all instances have been updated:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of PrepareAnswerSources with explicit threshold
rg -A 2 "PrepareAnswerSources.*threshold.*0.7"
# Look for any configuration files that might override the threshold
fd -e yaml -e json -e ini -e conf | xargs rg "threshold.*0.7"
Length of output: 436
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
PrepareAnswerSourcesclass constructor and its impact on source filtering.