Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

application manager #4

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 20, 2024
Merged

application manager #4

merged 12 commits into from
Jul 20, 2024

Conversation

cyri113
Copy link
Contributor

@cyri113 cyri113 commented Jul 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced the ApplicationManager contract for managing applications, including functionality for creating, updating, retrieving, and deleting applications.
    • Added an interface IApplicationManager defining the structure and methods for application management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced event emissions for application lifecycle changes to ensure proper tracking.
  • Tests

    • Established a comprehensive testing suite for the ApplicationManager contract to validate its core functionalities.
  • Style

    • Improved formatting and readability in various configuration files and documentation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Behzad-rabiei has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 785f903 and 0d502e5.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new ApplicationManager contract along with the IApplicationManager interface, significantly enhancing application management within a blockchain ecosystem. Key functionalities include the ability to create, retrieve, update, and delete applications, complete with event emissions for tracking lifecycle changes. A comprehensive suite of tests ensures the reliability of these operations, setting a solid foundation for future enhancements.

Changes

Files Change Summary
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol, contracts/IApplicationManager.sol Introduced ApplicationManager contract and IApplicationManager interface, defining CRUD operations and managing application lifecycle events.
test/ApplicationManager.ts Implemented a testing suite for ApplicationManager, validating deployment, application creation, event emissions, and consistent state management.
.editorconfig, .gitattributes, .github/workflows/ci.yml, .husky/pre-commit, .yarnrc.yml, README.md Minor formatting adjustments and whitespace normalization for improved readability and consistency across various configuration and documentation files.
.gitignore Reversed inclusion/exclusion settings for various Node.js modules and build artifacts, affecting which files are tracked by Git.

Possibly related issues

  • Application Manager #3: The changes to the ApplicationManager contract align with several requirements outlined in this issue, including defining an Application struct and implementing the specified CRUD functions.

Poem

🐇 In fields of code, where rabbits dwell,
A contract blooms, casting a spell.
With each new app, a tale to weave,
In digital meadows, we believe.
So hop along, let functions sing,
For in this world, we create, we bring! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.24;

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Incorrect versions of Solidity Warning

Version constraint ^0.8.24 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
.
It is used by:
- ^0.8.24
- ^0.8.24
- ^0.8.24
function deleteApplication(uint _id) external override {}

function getApplication(
uint _id

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Conformance to Solidity naming conventions Warning

Parameter ApplicationManager.getApplication(uint256)._id is not in mixedCase
return nextApplicationId_;
}

function createApplication(Application memory _application) external {

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Conformance to Solidity naming conventions Warning

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f77135 and 35aeb88.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/IApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • test/ApplicationManager.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Slither
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol

[warning] 2-2: Incorrect versions of Solidity
Version constraint ^0.8.24 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
.
It is used by:
- ^0.8.24 (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#2)
- ^0.8.24 (contracts/IApplicationManager.sol#2)
- ^0.8.24 (contracts/Lock.sol#2)


[warning] 33-33: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.getApplication(uint256)._id (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#33) is not in mixedCase


[warning] 16-16: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.createApplication(IApplicationManager.Application)._application (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#16) is not in mixedCase

Additional comments not posted (7)
contracts/IApplicationManager.sol (2)

4-8: LGTM!

The Application struct definition is clear and correct.


10-12: LGTM!

The event declarations are clear and correctly defined.

contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (2)

4-6: LGTM!

The import statement and contract declaration are correct.


7-10: LGTM!

The state variables and constructor are correctly defined.

test/ApplicationManager.ts (3)

1-9: LGTM!

The import statements and interface definition are correct.


11-31: LGTM!

The deployment fixture is correctly defined and reusable.


42-87: LGTM!

The createApplication tests are correctly defined.

Comment on lines 1 to 2
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update the Solidity version.

The specified Solidity version (^0.8.24) has known severe issues. Update to a more recent stable version.

- pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
+ pragma solidity ^0.8.25;
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.25;

Comment on lines 14 to 32
function nextApplicationId() external view returns (uint);

function createApplication(Application memory _application) external;

function updateApplication(
uint _id,
Application memory _application
) external;

function deleteApplication(uint _id) external;

function getApplication(
uint _id
) external view returns (Application memory);

function getApplications(
uint _start,
uint _limit
) external returns (Application[] memory application);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function createApplication(Application memory _application) external;
+ function createApplication(Application memory application) external;

- function updateApplication(uint _id, Application memory _application) external;
+ function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory application) external;

- function deleteApplication(uint _id) external;
+ function deleteApplication(uint id) external;

- function getApplication(uint _id) external view returns (Application memory);
+ function getApplication(uint id) external view returns (Application memory);

- function getApplications(uint _start, uint _limit) external returns (Application[] memory application);
+ function getApplications(uint start, uint limit) external returns (Application[] memory applications);
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function nextApplicationId() external view returns (uint);
function createApplication(Application memory _application) external;
function updateApplication(
uint _id,
Application memory _application
) external;
function deleteApplication(uint _id) external;
function getApplication(
uint _id
) external view returns (Application memory);
function getApplications(
uint _start,
uint _limit
) external returns (Application[] memory application);
function nextApplicationId() external view returns (uint);
function createApplication(Application memory application) external;
function updateApplication(
uint id,
Application memory application
) external;
function deleteApplication(uint id) external;
function getApplication(
uint id
) external view returns (Application memory);
function getApplications(
uint start,
uint limit
) external returns (Application[] memory applications);

Comment on lines 1 to 2
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update the Solidity version.

The specified Solidity version (^0.8.24) has known severe issues. Update to a more recent stable version.

- pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
+ pragma solidity ^0.8.25;
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.25;
Tools
GitHub Check: Slither

[warning] 2-2: Incorrect versions of Solidity
Version constraint ^0.8.24 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
.
It is used by:
- ^0.8.24 (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#2)
- ^0.8.24 (contracts/IApplicationManager.sol#2)
- ^0.8.24 (contracts/Lock.sol#2)

Comment on lines 25 to 36
function updateApplication(
uint _id,
Application memory _application
) external override {}

function deleteApplication(uint _id) external override {}

function getApplication(
uint _id
) external view returns (Application memory) {
return applications_[_id];
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implement the updateApplication and deleteApplication functions.

The updateApplication and deleteApplication functions are currently empty and need implementation.

- function updateApplication(uint _id, Application memory _application) external override {}
+ function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory application) external override {
+   applications_[id] = application;
+   emit ApplicationUpdated(id, application);
+ }

- function deleteApplication(uint _id) external override {}
+ function deleteApplication(uint id) external override {
+   Application memory application = applications_[id];
+   delete applications_[id];
+   emit ApplicationDeleted(id, application);
+ }
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function updateApplication(
uint _id,
Application memory _application
) external override {}
function deleteApplication(uint _id) external override {}
function getApplication(
uint _id
) external view returns (Application memory) {
return applications_[_id];
}
function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory application) external override {
applications_[id] = application;
emit ApplicationUpdated(id, application);
}
function deleteApplication(uint id) external override {
Application memory application = applications_[id];
delete applications_[id];
emit ApplicationDeleted(id, application);
}
function getApplication(
uint _id
) external view returns (Application memory) {
return applications_[_id];
}
Tools
GitHub Check: Slither

[warning] 33-33: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.getApplication(uint256)._id (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#33) is not in mixedCase

Comment on lines 12 to 22
function nextApplicationId() external view returns (uint) {
return nextApplicationId_;
}

function createApplication(Application memory _application) external {
applications_[nextApplicationId_] = _application;
emit ApplicationCreated(
nextApplicationId_,
applications_[nextApplicationId_]
);
nextApplicationId_++;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function createApplication(Application memory _application) external {
- applications_[nextApplicationId_] = _application;
+ function createApplication(Application memory application) external {
+ applications_[nextApplicationId_] = application;
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function nextApplicationId() external view returns (uint) {
return nextApplicationId_;
}
function createApplication(Application memory _application) external {
applications_[nextApplicationId_] = _application;
emit ApplicationCreated(
nextApplicationId_,
applications_[nextApplicationId_]
);
nextApplicationId_++;
function nextApplicationId() external view returns (uint) {
return nextApplicationId_;
}
function createApplication(Application memory application) external {
applications_[nextApplicationId_] = application;
emit ApplicationCreated(
nextApplicationId_,
applications_[nextApplicationId_]
);
nextApplicationId_++;
Tools
GitHub Check: Slither

[warning] 16-16: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.createApplication(IApplicationManager.Application)._application (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#16) is not in mixedCase

Comment on lines 33 to 39
describe("Deployment", () => {
it("Should set the nextxApplicationId to 0", async () => {
const { contract } = await loadFixture(deploy);
expect(await contract.read.nextApplicationId()).to.equal(
parseUnits("0", 0),
);
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the typo in the test description.

There is a typo in the test description: "nextxApplicationId" should be "nextApplicationId".

- it("Should set the nextxApplicationId to 0", async () => {
+ it("Should set the nextApplicationId to 0", async () => {
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
describe("Deployment", () => {
it("Should set the nextxApplicationId to 0", async () => {
const { contract } = await loadFixture(deploy);
expect(await contract.read.nextApplicationId()).to.equal(
parseUnits("0", 0),
);
});
describe("Deployment", () => {
it("Should set the nextApplicationId to 0", async () => {
const { contract } = await loadFixture(deploy);
expect(await contract.read.nextApplicationId()).to.equal(
parseUnits("0", 0),
);
});

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity 0.8.24;

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Different pragma directives are used Warning

2 different versions of Solidity are used:
- Version constraint 0.8.24 is used by:
-0.8.24
-0.8.24
- Version constraint ^0.8.24 is used by:
-^0.8.24
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity 0.8.24;

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Incorrect versions of Solidity Warning

Version constraint 0.8.24 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
.
It is used by:
- 0.8.24
- 0.8.24
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35aeb88 and 5218f2e.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/IApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • contracts/IApplicationManager.sol
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Slither
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol

[warning] 33-33: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.getApplication(uint256)._id (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#33) is not in mixedCase


[warning] 16-16: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.createApplication(IApplicationManager.Application)._application (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#16) is not in mixedCase


[warning] 2-2: Different pragma directives are used
2 different versions of Solidity are used:
- Version constraint 0.8.24 is used by:
-0.8.24 (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#2)
-0.8.24 (contracts/IApplicationManager.sol#2)
- Version constraint ^0.8.24 is used by:
-^0.8.24 (contracts/Lock.sol#2)


[warning] 2-2: Incorrect versions of Solidity
Version constraint 0.8.24 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
.
It is used by:
- 0.8.24 (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#2)
- 0.8.24 (contracts/IApplicationManager.sol#2)

Additional comments not posted (1)
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (1)

12-14: LGTM!

The nextApplicationId function is straightforward and correctly implemented.

Comment on lines 38 to 41
function getApplications(
uint _start,
uint _limit
) external override returns (Application[] memory application) {}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implement the getApplications function and conform to Solidity naming conventions.

The getApplications function is currently empty and needs implementation. Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function getApplications(uint _start, uint _limit) external override returns (Application[] memory application) {}
+ function getApplications(uint start, uint limit) external override returns (Application[] memory applications) {
+   Application[] memory apps = new Application[](limit);
+   for (uint i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
+       apps[i] = applications_[start + i];
+   }
+   return apps;
+ }
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function getApplications(
uint _start,
uint _limit
) external override returns (Application[] memory application) {}
function getApplications(
uint start,
uint limit
) external override returns (Application[] memory applications) {
Application[] memory apps = new Application[](limit);
for (uint i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
apps[i] = applications_[start + i];
}
return apps;
}

Application memory _application
) external override {}

function deleteApplication(uint _id) external override {}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implement the deleteApplication function and conform to Solidity naming conventions.

The deleteApplication function is currently empty and needs implementation. Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function deleteApplication(uint _id) external override {}
+ function deleteApplication(uint id) external override {
+   Application memory application = applications_[id];
+   delete applications_[id];
+   emit ApplicationDeleted(id, application);
+ }
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function deleteApplication(uint _id) external override {}
function deleteApplication(uint id) external override {
Application memory application = applications_[id];
delete applications_[id];
emit ApplicationDeleted(id, application);
}

Comment on lines 25 to 28
function updateApplication(
uint _id,
Application memory _application
) external override {}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implement the updateApplication function and conform to Solidity naming conventions.

The updateApplication function is currently empty and needs implementation. Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function updateApplication(uint _id, Application memory _application) external override {}
+ function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory application) external override {
+   applications_[id] = application;
+   emit ApplicationUpdated(id, application);
+ }
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function updateApplication(
uint _id,
Application memory _application
) external override {}
function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory application) external override {
applications_[id] = application;
emit ApplicationUpdated(id, application);
}

Comment on lines 16 to 22
function createApplication(Application memory _application) external {
applications_[nextApplicationId_] = _application;
emit ApplicationCreated(
nextApplicationId_,
applications_[nextApplicationId_]
);
nextApplicationId_++;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function createApplication(Application memory _application) external {
- applications_[nextApplicationId_] = _application;
+ function createApplication(Application memory application) external {
+ applications_[nextApplicationId_] = application;
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function createApplication(Application memory _application) external {
applications_[nextApplicationId_] = _application;
emit ApplicationCreated(
nextApplicationId_,
applications_[nextApplicationId_]
);
nextApplicationId_++;
function createApplication(Application memory application) external {
applications_[nextApplicationId_] = application;
emit ApplicationCreated(
nextApplicationId_,
applications_[nextApplicationId_]
);
nextApplicationId_++;
Tools
GitHub Check: Slither

[warning] 16-16: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.createApplication(IApplicationManager.Application)._application (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#16) is not in mixedCase

Comment on lines 32 to 36
function getApplication(
uint _id
) external view returns (Application memory) {
return applications_[_id];
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function getApplication(uint _id) external view returns (Application memory) {
-   return applications_[_id];
+ function getApplication(uint id) external view returns (Application memory) {
+   return applications_[id];
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function getApplication(
uint _id
) external view returns (Application memory) {
return applications_[_id];
}
function getApplication(
uint id
) external view returns (Application memory) {
return applications_[id];
}
Tools
GitHub Check: Slither

[warning] 33-33: Conformance to Solidity naming conventions
Parameter ApplicationManager.getApplication(uint256)._id (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#33) is not in mixedCase

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity 0.8.24;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update the Solidity version.

The specified Solidity version (0.8.24) has known severe issues. Update to a more recent stable version.

- pragma solidity 0.8.24;
+ pragma solidity 0.8.25;
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pragma solidity 0.8.24;
pragma solidity 0.8.25;
Tools
GitHub Check: Slither

[warning] 2-2: Different pragma directives are used
2 different versions of Solidity are used:
- Version constraint 0.8.24 is used by:
-0.8.24 (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#2)
-0.8.24 (contracts/IApplicationManager.sol#2)
- Version constraint ^0.8.24 is used by:
-^0.8.24 (contracts/Lock.sol#2)


[warning] 2-2: Incorrect versions of Solidity
Version constraint 0.8.24 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
.
It is used by:
- 0.8.24 (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#2)
- 0.8.24 (contracts/IApplicationManager.sol#2)

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity 0.8.25;

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Incorrect versions of Solidity Warning

Version constraint 0.8.25 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
.
It is used by:
- 0.8.25
- 0.8.25
Comment on lines 48 to 63
function getApplications(uint start, uint limit) external view returns (Application[] memory) {
Application[] memory result = new Application[](limit);
uint count = 0;
uint index = start;
while (count < limit && index < nextApplicationId) {
if (applicationExists(index)) {
result[count] = applications[index];
count++;
}
index++;
}

assembly { mstore(result, count) }

return result;
}

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Assembly usage Warning

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5218f2e and 1a364ff.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .yarn/install-state.gz is excluded by !**/.yarn/**
Files selected for processing (5)
  • .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
  • contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/IApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • hardhat.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/ApplicationManager.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • contracts/IApplicationManager.sol
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Slither
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol

[warning] 48-63: Assembly usage
ApplicationManager.getApplications(uint256,uint256) (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#48-63) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#60)

Biome
test/ApplicationManager.ts

[error] 331-331: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

Additional comments not posted (18)
.vscode/settings.json (1)

4-5: LGTM! The new Solidity compiler version setting is correctly added.

The addition of "solidity.compileUsingRemoteVersion": "v0.8.26+commit.8a97fa7a" ensures that the development environment uses the specified Solidity compiler version.

hardhat.config.ts (1)

6-6: LGTM! The Solidity compiler version update is correctly applied.

The update to "0.8.26" ensures that the project uses the latest stable version of the Solidity compiler.

contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (5)

13-15: LGTM! The applicationExists function is correctly implemented.

The function uses appropriate logic to check if an application exists by verifying if the account address is not zero.


16-18: LGTM! The getNextApplicationId function is correctly implemented.

The function returns the next application ID as expected.


36-41: LGTM! The deleteApplication function is correctly implemented.

The function includes appropriate checks and logic for deleting an application and emits an event for tracking the deletion.


43-46: LGTM! The getApplication function is correctly implemented.

The function includes appropriate checks and logic for retrieving an application by its ID.


11-11: LGTM! The constructor is correctly implemented.

The constructor does not perform any initialization, which is acceptable if no initialization is required.

test/ApplicationManager.ts (11)

1-5: Imports Look Good!

The import statements are appropriate and necessary for the tests.


7-10: Interface Definition Looks Good!

The Application interface is correctly defined with name and account.


16-32: Deployment Function Looks Good!

The deploy function correctly sets up the contract and accounts for testing.


34-38: Random Address Generation Looks Good!

The generateRandomAddress function correctly generates a random address using a private key.


40-47: Fix the typo in the test description.

There is a typo in the test description: "nextxApplicationId" should be "nextApplicationId".

- it("Should set the nextxApplicationId to 0", async () => {
+ it("Should set the nextApplicationId to 0", async () =>

49-99: Test Cases for createApplication Look Good!

The test cases correctly verify the creation of an application, including input validation, incrementing application ID, and event emission.


102-171: Test Cases for updateApplication Look Good!

The test cases correctly verify the updating of an application, including input validation, updating application data, and event emission.


174-223: Test Cases for deleteApplication Look Good!

The test cases correctly verify the deletion of an application, including input validation and event emission.


226-259: Test Cases for getApplication Look Good!

The test cases correctly verify the retrieval of an application, including input validation.


262-327: Test Cases for getApplications Look Good!

The test cases correctly verify the retrieval of multiple applications, including input validation and handling edge cases.


330-348: Test Case for getNextApplicationId Looks Good!

The test case correctly verifies the retrieval of the next application ID.

Tools
Biome

[error] 331-331: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

test/ApplicationManager.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a364ff and 785f903.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • .yarn/install-state.gz is excluded by !**/.yarn/**
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (10)
  • .editorconfig (1 hunks)
  • .gitattributes (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
  • .yarnrc.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/IApplicationManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • test/ApplicationManager.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
  • .editorconfig
  • .gitattributes
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • .husky/pre-commit
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • README.md
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • test/ApplicationManager.ts
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Slither
contracts/ApplicationManager.sol

[warning] 48-63: Assembly usage
ApplicationManager.getApplications(uint256,uint256) (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#48-63) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#60)

Additional comments not posted (13)
contracts/IApplicationManager.sol (3)

1-2: LGTM! Solidity version and license identifier are appropriate.

The file specifies Solidity version 0.8.26 and includes the SPDX license identifier.


4-12: LGTM! Struct and event declarations are well-defined.

The Application struct and the events for application lifecycle changes are appropriately defined.


14-19: Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function createApplication(Application memory _application) external;
+ function createApplication(Application memory application) external;

- function updateApplication(uint _id, Application memory _application) external;
+ function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory application) external;

- function deleteApplication(uint _id) external;
+ function deleteApplication(uint id) external;

- function getApplication(uint _id) external view returns (Application memory);
+ function getApplication(uint id) external view returns (Application memory);

- function getApplications(uint _start, uint _limit) external returns (Application[] memory application);
+ function getApplications(uint start, uint limit) external returns (Application[] memory applications);
.gitignore (1)

1-53: LGTM! Appropriate .gitignore entries.

The file lists directories and files related to Node.js modules, Hardhat, TypeChain, and solidity-coverage, which are appropriate to ignore.

contracts/ApplicationManager.sol (9)

1-4: LGTM! Solidity version, license identifier, and imports are appropriate.

The file specifies Solidity version 0.8.26, includes the SPDX license identifier, and imports the IApplicationManager interface.


6-11: LGTM! State variables and constructor are well-defined.

The contract defines mappings for applications and used addresses, and a variable for the next application ID. The constructor is appropriately defined.


13-15: LGTM! Internal function applicationExists is well-defined.

The function checks if an application exists based on the application ID.


16-18: LGTM! External function getNextApplicationId is well-defined.

The function returns the next application ID.


20-25: Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function createApplication(Application memory application) external {
+ function createApplication(Application memory newApplication) external {
- require(!addressUsed[application.account], "Address already used for another application");
- applications[nextApplicationId] = application;
- addressUsed[application.account] = true;
- emit ApplicationCreated(nextApplicationId, applications[nextApplicationId]);
+ require(!addressUsed[newApplication.account], "Address already used for another application");
+ applications[nextApplicationId] = newApplication;
+ addressUsed[newApplication.account] = true;
+ emit ApplicationCreated(nextApplicationId, applications[nextApplicationId]);

28-34: Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory application) external {
+ function updateApplication(uint id, Application memory updatedApplication) external {
- require(!addressUsed[application.account] || applications[id].account == application.account,
+ require(!addressUsed[updatedApplication.account] || applications[id].account == updatedApplication.account,
- applications[id] = application;
- emit ApplicationUpdated(id, applications[id]);
+ applications[id] = updatedApplication;
+ emit ApplicationUpdated(id, applications[id]);

36-41: Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function deleteApplication(uint id) external {
+ function deleteApplication(uint applicationId) external {
- require(applicationExists(id), "Application does not exist");
- addressUsed[applications[id].account] = false;
- emit ApplicationDeleted(id, applications[id]);
- delete applications[id];
+ require(applicationExists(applicationId), "Application does not exist");
+ addressUsed[applications[applicationId].account] = false;
+ emit ApplicationDeleted(applicationId, applications[applicationId]);
+ delete applications[applicationId];

43-46: Conform to Solidity naming conventions.

Parameters should follow mixedCase naming conventions.

- function getApplication(uint id) external view returns (Application memory) {
- require(applicationExists(id), "Application does not exist");
- return applications[id];
+ function getApplication(uint applicationId) external view returns (Application memory) {
+ require(applicationExists(applicationId), "Application does not exist");
+ return applications[applicationId];

48-63: Avoid using inline assembly for modifying array length.

Using inline assembly can introduce security risks and maintainability issues. Consider using a more straightforward approach to modify the length of the result array.

- assembly { mstore(result, count) }
+ Application[] memory finalResult = new Application[](count);
+ for (uint i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+     finalResult[i] = result[i];
+ }
+ return finalResult;
Tools
GitHub Check: Slither

[warning] 48-63: Assembly usage
ApplicationManager.getApplications(uint256,uint256) (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#48-63) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (contracts/ApplicationManager.sol#60)

@cyri113 cyri113 merged commit d4f1a4a into main Jul 20, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants