Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: added new events for hivemind & discord adapter services! #56

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

amindadgar
Copy link
Member

@amindadgar amindadgar commented Oct 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new event type, DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent, enhancing event handling capabilities.
    • Added new string constants for improved event communication: QUESTION_COMMAND_RECIVED and QUESTION_RESPONSE_RECIVED.
  • Improvements

    • Updated the package version to 1.7.1, ensuring users have the latest features and fixes.
    • Modified existing event constants for better clarity and functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the tc-messageBroker package version from 1.7.0 to 1.7.1 in setup.py. A new event type, DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent, has been introduced in events_microservice.py, which includes two new string constants: QUESTION_COMMAND_RECIVED and QUESTION_RESPONSE_RECIVED. The HivemindEvent class has been modified, removing two constants and updating one. Additionally, a new class attribute DISCORD_HIVEMIND_ADAPTER has been added to the Event class in event.py.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
setup.py Updated version from 1.7.0 to 1.7.1.
tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/events_microservice.py Added DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent class with constants QUESTION_COMMAND_RECIVED and QUESTION_RESPONSE_RECIVED. Removed constants INTERACTION_CREATED and GUILD_MESSAGES_UPDATED from HivemindEvent. Updated constant QUESTION_RECIVED.
tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/event.py Added DISCORD_HIVEMIND_ADAPTER method to Event class.
tests/unit/test_event.py Updated assertions to reflect changes: removed assertions for INTERACTION_CREATED and GUILD_MESSAGES_UPDATED, added assertion for QUESTION_RECIVED.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A new event has come to stay.
With constants bright, they hop along,
A version up, where we belong!
So let us cheer, with joy and glee,
For changes sweet, like honeybee! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/event.py (1)

16-16: LGTM: New class attribute added correctly

The addition of DISCORD_HIVEMIND_ADAPTER to the Event class is consistent with the existing code style and aligns with the PR objectives.

Consider reordering the class attributes alphabetically for improved readability:

 class Event:
     SERVER_API = ServerEvent
     DISCORD_ANALYZER = DiscordAnalyzerEvent
     DISCORD_BOT = DiscordBotEvent
+    DISCORD_HIVEMIND_ADAPTER = DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent
     HIVEMIND = HivemindEvent
-    DISCORD_HIVEMIND_ADAPTER = DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent
     TWITTER_ANALYZER = TwitterAnalyzerEvent
     TWITTER_BOT = TwitterBotEvent
tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/events_microservice.py (1)

55-65: Summary of changes and potential impact

The changes introduce a new DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent class and modify the existing HivemindEvent class. These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring to support Discord-Hivemind integration. Here's a summary of the key points:

  1. The new DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent class adds support for question-related events in the Discord-Hivemind adapter.
  2. The HivemindEvent class has been simplified to focus on question-related events, aligning with the new adapter class.
  3. Typos in constant names have been identified in both classes and should be corrected.
  4. The removal of constants from HivemindEvent may impact existing code and should be verified.

To ensure a smooth integration of these changes:

  1. Fix all identified typos.
  2. Verify that the removed constants from HivemindEvent don't break existing functionality.
  3. Update any code that may have been relying on the removed constants.
  4. Consider adding docstrings to both classes to explain their purpose and usage.

These changes suggest a shift towards a more modular event structure for different services. To maintain this direction:

  1. Consider creating a base class for question-related events that both DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent and HivemindEvent could inherit from.
  2. Ensure consistent naming conventions across all event classes (e.g., using "RECEIVED" instead of "RECIVED").
  3. If more adapters are planned in the future, consider creating a naming convention or structure that makes it easy to add new adapter-specific event classes.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e46e31f and 84e3344.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
  • tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/event.py (2 hunks)
  • tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/events_microservice.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • setup.py
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/event.py (1)

4-4: LGTM: New import added correctly

The addition of DiscordHivemindAdapterEvent to the import statement is consistent with the existing code style and aligns with the PR objectives.

tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/events_microservice.py (1)

65-65: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in constant name and verify impact of removed constants.

  1. There's a typo in the constant name: QUESTION_RECIVED should be QUESTION_RECEIVED.
  2. Two constants (INTERACTION_CREATED and GUILD_MESSAGES_UPDATED) have been removed from this class. Please ensure that this doesn't break any existing code that might be using these constants.

Here's the suggested fix for the typo:

 class HivemindEvent:
-    QUESTION_RECIVED = "QUESTION_RECIVED"
+    QUESTION_RECEIVED = "QUESTION_RECEIVED"

To verify the impact of the removed constants, run the following script:

If the script returns any results, those occurrences need to be updated or removed to reflect the changes in the HivemindEvent class.

tc_messageBroker/rabbit_mq/event/events_microservice.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/unit/test_event.py (1)

26-26: Remove commented-out code

The commented-out assertion at the end of the file appears to be unrelated to the current changes and may be leftover code. To maintain code cleanliness, it's generally best to remove unused commented-out code.

Consider removing this line:

-    # assert Event.DISCORD_ANALYZER.SAVE == "SAVE"

If this assertion is needed for future use, it would be better to track it in a separate issue or TODO comment with context, rather than leaving it as commented-out code in the test file.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84e3344 and bdf7a9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/unit/test_event.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

tests/unit/test_event.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@amindadgar amindadgar merged commit 56263f9 into main Oct 16, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants