fix: wrong collection name assignment in ingestion pipeline!

[amindadgar]

• The community_id was assigned to collection_name before but now it is updated to the actual "community_id_platform_name"
• docstore is also updated to be as before which is "docstore_community_id"

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Corrected a typo in logging messages from "docuemnts" to "documents".

• Improvements

  • Updated the construction of the collection name for better consistency.
  • Simplified parameters in the ingestion process to enhance clarity and functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request focus on modifications to the CustomIngestionPipeline class within the ingestion_pipeline.py file. The constructor has been updated to create a collection_name by concatenating community_id and the original collection_name. Additionally, adjustments were made to the run_pipeline method, including the removal of the qdrant_collection_name variable and updates to logging messages. The db_name and collection parameters have been simplified to enhance consistency in naming conventions throughout the class.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
dags/hivemind_etl_helpers/ingestion_pipeline.py	- Updated collection_name construction in __init__ method. - Corrected typo in logging message. - Removed qdrant_collection_name variable. - Updated db_name in MongoDocumentStore.from_uri to use self.community_id. - Simplified collection parameter in IngestionCache to use self.collection_name. - Ensured consistent use of self.collection_name in other methods.

Poem

🐇 In the pipeline where data flows,
A name now shines, as everyone knows.
Community and collection unite,
In a format that's tidy and bright.
With typos fixed and paths aligned,
Our ingestion's now perfectly refined! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)

dags/hivemind_etl_helpers/ingestion_pipeline.py (2)

35-35: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for clarity.

The change correctly implements the collection name format as described in the PR objectives. This ensures unique collection names for each community and platform combination.

For improved clarity, consider renaming the collection_name parameter to platform_name in the method signature, as it now represents the platform rather than the full collection name. This would make the code more self-explanatory:

def __init__(self, community_id: str, platform_name: str, testing: bool = False):
    # ...
    self.collection_name = f"{community_id}_{platform_name}"
    self.platform_name = platform_name
    # ...

---

66-66: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for consistency.

The changes correctly implement the new collection naming convention and revert the docstore naming as described in the PR objectives. The modifications ensure consistency across different parts of the ingestion pipeline.

For improved consistency, consider updating the namespace parameter in the MongoDocumentStore.from_uri call to use self.platform_name instead of self.platform_name:

docstore=MongoDocumentStore.from_uri(
    uri=get_mongo_uri(),
    db_name=f"docstore_{self.community_id}",
    namespace=self.platform_name,
),

This change would make the usage of platform_name consistent throughout the class.

Also applies to: 76-76, 82-82

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5eeb2c4 and cf6411a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• dags/hivemind_etl_helpers/ingestion_pipeline.py (3 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (2)

dags/hivemind_etl_helpers/ingestion_pipeline.py (2)

66-66: LGTM! Typo correction improves logging quality.

The correction of "docuemnts" to "documents" in the logging message is a good catch. While it doesn't affect functionality, it improves the quality and professionalism of the logging output.

---

Line range hint 1-165: Overall, the changes successfully address the PR objectives and improve code consistency.

The modifications to the CustomIngestionPipeline class correctly implement the new collection naming convention and revert the docstore naming as described in the PR objectives. These changes ensure consistency across different parts of the ingestion pipeline and fix the previously incorrect collection name assignment.

Key improvements:

1. The collection_name is now correctly constructed using both community_id and platform_name.
2. The docstore naming convention has been reverted to use community_id.
3. The ingestion cache collection name has been simplified and is now consistent with the new collection_name format.
4. A typo in a logging message has been corrected.

These changes enhance the overall quality and consistency of the code while addressing the specific issues mentioned in the PR objectives.