Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 26, 2021. It is now read-only.

[improvement] C,cpp links to doc sites instead #13

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kvedala
Copy link

@kvedala kvedala commented Jul 8, 2020

C/C++ links to doc sites instead instead of GitHub Repo sites

C/C++ links to doc sites instead
@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Jul 8, 2020

I am not a fan of this change. Our primary deliverable is our algorithms, not our docs.

@mrmaxguns
Copy link
Member

I think this would be nice, however, that would mean that the links aren't standardized. Some will point to the repos while others will point to their websites.

@kvedala
Copy link
Author

kvedala commented Jul 8, 2020

I am not a fan of this change. Our primary deliverable is our algorithms, not our docs.

Isn't it to provide with educative and learning resources? How does a raw repo that does not have a navigation better than a well-formatted website that does also provide access the toe same raw codes?

@kvedala
Copy link
Author

kvedala commented Jul 8, 2020

I think this would be nice, however, that would mean that the links aren't standardized. Some will point to the repos while others will point to their websites.

Agreed. This would mean that the other repositories also generate a formatted output. I think Python repo is already good to generate Sphinx docs or read-the-docs kind of sites.

@mrmaxguns
Copy link
Member

Agreed. This would mean that the other repositories also generate a formatted output. I think Python repo is already good to generate Sphinx docs or read-the-docs kind of sites.

Definitely. The python repository is extremely large and docs aren't a requirement. It would already require extensive documentation.

I think we should standardize either the sites or repositories, not both as it would lead to a mess.

@kvedala kvedala added the on hold Pull-request placed on hold. Please read Comments for details. label Jul 8, 2020
@kvedala
Copy link
Author

kvedala commented Jul 8, 2020

Agreed. This would mean that the other repositories also generate a formatted output. I think Python repo is already good to generate Sphinx docs or read-the-docs kind of sites.

Definitely. The python repository is extremely large and docs aren't a requirement. It would already require extensive documentation.

I think we should standardize either the sites or repositories, not both as it would lead to a mess.

Agreed

@kvedala kvedala linked an issue Jul 8, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
@mrmaxguns
Copy link
Member

I'll close this PR since TheAlgorithms has a new website.

@mrmaxguns mrmaxguns closed this Feb 28, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
on hold Pull-request placed on hold. Please read Comments for details.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Links to raw repo or documentation sites?
3 participants